Mega Offer Avail 65% Off in CA IPCC and 50% Off in all CA CS CMA subjects.Coupon- IPCEXAM65 & EXAM50. Call: 088803-20003

CA Final Online Classes
CA Classes

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Omaxe New Chandigarh Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Ors (Delhi High Court)

LinkedIn


Court :
Delhi High Court

Brief :
Mr. Aproov Kurup, CGSC with Mr. Abhishek Khanna, GP. Ms. Sonu Bhatnagar, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Venus Mehrotra, Ms. Anushree Narain, Ms. Mallika Joshi and Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, Advs. For R-2. Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms. Suhani Mathur, Advocate for R- 3 to 5

Citation :
W.P.(C) 12653/2019 & CM APPL. 51654/2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Decision delivered on: 05.04.2021
W.P.(C) 12653/2019 & CM APPL. 51654/2019 
M/S OMAXE NEW CHANDIGARH DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. 
(FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.) & ANR. ..... Petitioners 
Through: Mr. Puneet Aggarwal, Mr. Deepak Anand, Ms. Purvi Sinha and Ms. Hemlata Rawat, Advocates.

versus 

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents

Through: 
Mr. Aproov Kurup, CGSC with Mr. Abhishek Khanna, GP. Ms. Sonu Bhatnagar, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Venus Mehrotra, Ms. Anushree Narain, Ms. Mallika Joshi and Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, Advs. For R-2.

Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Mr. Gagan Vaswani and Mr. Jasneet Jolly, Advocates for R-3 to R-5.

W.P.(C) 7842/2020 & CM APPL. 25745/2020
OMAXE LTD & ANR. ..... Petitioners

Through: Mr.Puneet Aggarwal, Mr. Deepak Anand, Ms.Purvi Sinha and Ms.Hemlata Rawat, Advocates.

versus 

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents

Through: 

Mr. Aproov Kurup, CGSC with Mr. Abhishek Khanna, GP. Ms. Sonu Bhatnagar, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Venus Mehrotra, Ms. Anushree Narain, Ms. Mallika Joshi and Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, Advs. For R-2. Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms. Suhani Mathur, Advocate for R- 3 to 5

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH 
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL):

1. The limited issue which arises for consideration in the captioned writ petitions concerns the applicability of the instruction dated 21.12.2015 bearing F. No. 1080/09/DLA/MISC/15/757 [in short “2015 instruction”] and the Master Circular dated 10.03.2017 [in short “2017 Master Circular”], issued by Central Board of Excise & Customs, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India [presently, known as “Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs”]. In this context, in particular, the petitioners rely upon paragraph 5 of the 2017 Master Circular. 

2. It is the submission of the petitioners that as per paragraph 5 of the 2017 Master Circular, the contesting respondents i.e. respondents nos. 2 to 5, who are represented by Mr. Satish Aggarwala in W.P.(C) 12653/2019 and Mr. Harpreet Singh in W.P.(C) 7842/2020, were mandatorily required to hold pre-show cause notice consultation with the petitioners prior to initiation of the proceedings under the Finance Act, 1994.

To know more in details find the attachment file

 

Guest
on 19 April 2021
Published in LAW
Views : 18
Report Abuse

LinkedIn







Trending Tags