Madras HC: University cannot be levied Service Tax for disseminating Educational Services


Last updated: 09 September 2021

Court :
Madras High Court

Brief :
In Madurai Kamaraj University v. Joint Commissioner GST and Central Excise [W.P.(MD) No.20502 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD) No.17152 of 2019 dated August 16, 2021], Madurai Kamaraj University ("the Petitioner") has sought for a writ of Certiorari for quashing of the records on the file of  Joint Commissioner GST and Central Excise ("the Respondent") in proceedings Order inOriginal No. MDU- ST-JC-12-2019dated May 30, 2019 in File No.V/ST/15/50/2018-Adjn, on account of being illegitimate and arbitrary.

Citation :
W.P.(MD) No.20502 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD) No.17152 of 2019 dated August 16, 2021

In Madurai Kamaraj University v. Joint Commissioner GST and Central Excise [W.P.(MD) No.20502 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD) No.17152 of 2019 dated August 16, 2021], Madurai Kamaraj University ("the Petitioner") has sought for a writ of Certiorari for quashing of the records on the file of  Joint Commissioner GST and Central Excise ("the Respondent") in proceedings Order inOriginal No. MDU- ST-JC-12-2019dated May 30, 2019 in File No.V/ST/15/50/2018-Adjn, on account of being illegitimate and arbitrary.

To substantiate its case, the Petitioner contended that educational institutions are exempted from the ambit of Service Tax as stated under Clause 1 of Section 66-D of the Finance Act, 1994 (effective until May 14, 2016) and Clause (OA) of the "Mega Services Exemption Notification" dated June 20, 2012 issued by the Central Government. As opposed to the contentions made by the Petitioner, the Respondent counsel argued that the exemption provided under Section 66 - D (1) of the Finance Act, 1994 and the "Mega Services Exemption Notification" are concerned only with educational institutions that provide pre-school education and education up to higher secondary or equivalent. Furthermore, it was contended by the Respondent that the Petitioner institution does not impart education directly to the students and is only an affiliating body.

After perusal of all the facts and evidence, the Honorable Madras High Court adjudged that the Petitioner educational institution cannot be assessed for demanding any service tax for the services of education provided by them. The Court opined the ratio that Sub-Clause 2 of Clause 'l' of Section 66-D was relevant for the issue at hand, the reason being that, whatever be the education as a part of curriculum for obtaining a qualification recognized by law for the time being in force means whatever be the Degree, Diploma, PG diploma, Professional Degree or Post Graduate Degree are concerned, in order to obtain such qualification, if education being imparted as a part of curriculum, that education shall be part of service for the purpose Clause 'l' for getting exemption.

 

Comments




CCI Pro

Follow us
add to google news


Company
10 June 2026
Senior Account Executive

JDS Advisory LLP

Ahmedabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 15 June 2026
Senior Auditor

N. Dhawan & Co

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 18 June 2026
Article Assistance

RB KESHRI & CO.

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
16 June 2026
Sr. Associate / Assistant Manager | TAS / FDD

Boutique Investment Bank & Transaction Advisory Firm

Gurgaon

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 31 May 2026
Article Assistant

KPRS And Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
22 June 2026
Finance Manager- Chartered Accountant

Triveni Turbine Limited

Bengaluru

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 June 2026
CA Article Trainee

Rahul Dang & Associates

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
04 June 2026
Semi Qualified CA

Goyal Puneet & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details