Lack of opportunity of hearing results in stay of Bank Attachment and Cancellation of Registration


Quick Summary
The Chhattisgarh High Court has stayed the provisional attachment of a company's bank account and the cancellation of its GST registration. The court found that the company was not given an opportunity to be heard before these actions were taken, which is a requirement under the CGST Rules. The court noted that the authorities failed to provide sufficient grounds for the attachment and cancellation, leading to the business's closure.

Court :
High Court of Chhattisgarh

Brief :
The Hon’ble High Court of Chhattisgarh, relied on the case of Valerius Industries v. Union of India [Special Civil Application No. 13132 of 2019 dated July 31, 2019] which stated that there has to be some relevance to establish the sufficiency of ground and to state an opinion by the authority in this regard of attachment of a like nature.

Citation :
WP(T) No. 51 of 2021 dated August 09, 2021

In Cheema Local Carrier & Construction v.Assistant Commissioner SGST [WP(T) No. 51 of 2021 dated August 09, 2021], Cheema Local Carrier & Construction ('the Petitioner') has filed the current writ petition challenging three issues:

  • Provisional attachment of bank account,
  • Cancellation of registration certificate under Goods and Services Tax ('GST'); and
  • Input Tax Credit ('ITC') being blocked.

The Petitioner contended that Rule 21 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 ('CGST Rules'), mandates the ground of cancellation of registration must exist, however the Show Cause Notice ('SCN') issued did not mention the contraventions which the Petitioner must have made which resulted in cancellation of registration.

Also contended that under Rule 159(5) of the CGST Rules, when the objection is filed against attachment, the Commissioner after affording an opportunity of being heard may release the said property/ account. In the current case, no hearing was provided to the petitioner, which resulted into closure of the business.

The Hon’ble High Court of Chhattisgarh, relied on the case of Valerius Industries v. Union of India [Special Civil Application No. 13132 of 2019 dated July 31, 2019] which stated that there has to be some relevance to establish the sufficiency of ground and to state an opinion by the authority in this regard of attachment of a like nature.

It further noted, if the reply is not filed, the attachment order of the bank account and cancellation of registration does not show that what grounds were existing to pass such order.

Additionally, it directed the order dated February 17,2021 directing the attachment of Bank Account along with the order for cancellation of registration dated March 26, 2021 shall remain stayed, till the next date of hearing.

FAQ :

The main issue was the provisional attachment of the company's bank account and the cancellation of its GST registration, which the company challenged due to a lack of opportunity to be heard.

Rule 21 of the CGST Rules, concerning grounds for cancellation of registration, and Rule 159(5) of the CGST Rules, regarding objections to attachment and the requirement for a hearing, were relevant.

No, the company contended that they were not provided with an opportunity of being heard before the attachment and cancellation orders were issued.

The High Court stayed the order dated February 17, 2021, for bank account attachment and the order dated March 26, 2021, for cancellation of registration until the next hearing.

The court relied on the case of Valerius Industries v. Union of India, which stated that authorities must establish sufficient grounds for attachment orders.

 

Bimal Jain
Published in GST
Views : 152

Comments




CCI Pro