Is penalty u/s 271(1)(c) sustainable when the AO has rejected book results and adopted a higher profit ratio on estimate basis?


Quick Summary
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi has ruled on a penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act. The Assessing Officer (AO) had rejected the assessee's book results and made an addition to income by estimating profit at 14.5% on sales, which the assessee had agreed to for estimation purposes. The ITAT allowed the appeal, finding the penalty unsustainable in this scenario.

Court :
ITAT Delhi

Brief :
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 31st January, 2018 of the CIT(A), Ghaziabad, relating to assessment year 2013-14.

Citation :
ITA No.2059/Del/2018

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCH : F : NEW DELHI
BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
AND
SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
ITA No.2059/Del/2018
Assessment Year: 2013-14

V.B. Builders,
C/o Praveen Aggarwal & Co.,CAs,
23, Bhai Veer Singh Marg,
Gole Market,
New Delhi

PAN: AAGFV0254P

(Appellant)

VS

DCIT,
Circle-2,
Ghaziabad.

(Respondent)

Assessee by : Shri KVSR Krishnan, CA
Revenue by : Shri N.K. Bansal, Sr. DR
Date of Hearing : 19.07.2021
Date of Pronouncement : 27.07.2021
ORDER

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 31st January, 2018 of the CIT(A), Ghaziabad, relating to assessment year 2013-14.

2. Levy of penalty of Rs.6,63,960/- by the AO u/s 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961 which has been upheld by the CIT(A) is the only issue raised by the assessee in the grounds of appeal.

3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is a partnership firm engaged in the business of real estate. It filed its return of income on 29th October, 2013 declaring total income at Rs.1,78,80,820/-. The AO completed the assessment u/s 143(3) of the IT Act, 1961 on 30th December, 2015 determining the total income of the assessee at Rs.2,00,28,920/- wherein he made an addition of Rs.21,48,102/- by estimating the profit at 14.5% as agreed by the assessee for such estimation.

4. We find, the AO, in the instant case, made addition of Rs.21,48,102/- to the total income of the assessee by estimating the profit on sale of Rs.11,82,69,105/- @ 14.5% and after deducting the business income already shown by the assessee had made addition of the same.

5. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed.
Pronounced in the open court on 27.07.2021.

Please find attached the enclosed file for the full judgement

FAQ :

The appeal concerned the sustainability of a penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, when the Assessing Officer (AO) rejected the assessee's book results and made an addition based on an estimated profit ratio.

The AO rejected the assessee's book results and made an addition of Rs. 21,48,102/- to the total income by estimating the profit on sales at 14.5%, an estimation basis agreed to by the assessee.

The assessee, a partnership firm engaged in real estate, filed its return of income declaring a total income of Rs. 1,78,80,820/-.

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, setting aside the penalty.

 

Poojitha Raam Vinay
Published in Income Tax
Views : 97
downloaded 285 times

Comments




CCI Pro