Avail 20% discount on updated CA lectures for Dec 21 .Use Code RESULT20 !! Call : 088803-20003


Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Income u/s 28(i)


Court :

Brief :
Case Fact: Whether where assesse used to collect deposit/security from customers against bottles sold ,which was refundable subject to certain conditions, the surplus in bottle deposit account could be treated as income.

Citation :
C.I.T Vs. Doongaji & Co. Distillery

Decision: Held by Hon"ble court that the money collected by assesse from each customer against bottles sold could not be treated as income of the assessee, as the assessee was under an obligation to return the money subject to fulfillment of certain conditions by the customer.

CA. A. Kumar
on 10 July 2008
Published in Income Tax
Views :
Report Abuse


Trending Tags