Income u/s 28(i)
Court :
Brief :
Case Fact: Whether where assesse used to collect deposit/security from customers against bottles sold ,which was refundable subject to certain conditions, the surplus in bottle deposit account could be treated as income.
Citation :
C.I.T Vs. Doongaji & Co. Distillery
Decision: Held by Hon"ble court that the money collected by assesse from each customer against bottles sold could not be treated as income of the assessee, as the assessee was under an obligation to return the money subject to fulfillment of certain conditions by the customer.
CA. A. Kumar
Published in Income Tax
Views : 86
Comments
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
