Court :
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Brief :
Following effective grounds of appeal:-
1. That the ld.CIT(A) had erred in deleting disallowance of Rs.8,66,798/- as disallowed by the AO which was claimed by the assessee as business loss.
2. That the ld.CIT(A) had erred in deleting the addition of Rs.1,36,620/- made by the AO as suppressed income of the assessee from the contract business.
3. That the ld.CIT(A) had erred in directing the AO in recalculate the amount of depreciation. The AO disallowed an amount of Rs.4,85,114/- as depreciation as claimed by the assessee.
4. That the ld.CIT(A) had erred in deleting the treatment of Rs.25,98,820/- as made by the AO as interest on borrowed money. The AO disallowed the amount of interest of payment, made by the assessee, to the tuen of Rs.25,98,820/-.
5. That the ld.CIT(A) had erred in deleting the addition of Rs.3,348/- made by the AO as ‘Excess Provision of Income Tax Written Back
Citation :
I.T.O Ward 4(2), Kolkata (APPELLANT) Vs M/s. Mukti Properties (P) Ltd.PAN: AACCM 0424D (RESPONDENT)
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
- No Ads
- WhatsApp Community
- Daily E-Newsletter
- Unlimited Judgements Access
- Profile Visitors
- Link Social Profiles
- Featured Job Posts
- Pro Badge
- Expert GST Guidance
- Unlimited Forum Replies
- Download Content in PDF
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience. 07941056694
Comments
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
