Court :
 INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Brief :
  Following effective grounds of appeal:-
1. That the ld.CIT(A) had erred in deleting disallowance of Rs.8,66,798/- as disallowed by the AO which was claimed by the assessee as business loss.
2. That the ld.CIT(A) had erred in deleting the addition of Rs.1,36,620/- made by the AO as suppressed income of the assessee from the contract business.
3. That the ld.CIT(A) had erred in directing the AO in recalculate the amount of depreciation. The AO disallowed an amount of Rs.4,85,114/- as depreciation as claimed by the assessee.
4. That the ld.CIT(A) had erred in deleting the treatment of Rs.25,98,820/- as made by the AO as interest on borrowed money. The AO disallowed the amount of interest of payment, made by the assessee, to the tuen of Rs.25,98,820/-.
5. That the ld.CIT(A) had erred in deleting the addition of Rs.3,348/- made by the AO as โExcess Provision of Income Tax Written Back
Citation :
  I.T.O Ward 4(2), Kolkata (APPELLANT) Vs M/s. Mukti Properties (P) Ltd.PAN: AACCM 0424D (RESPONDENT)
 
			
				Browse CAclubindia ads free. 
Latest updates on WA.
 Daily E-Newsletter and much more.
CCI PRO annual subscription : 
			
          Duration : 1 year  
(Prices Inclusive of GST)
        
 
							
							
							
							  
			 
  
  
  LIVE Course on GSTR-9 & GSTR-9C (Technical | Practical | Concept - Based)
 
                                
                             
  
  