Can the assessee claim deduction of the cost of land, which is now given as a parking space to shop owners?


Quick Summary
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi addressed an appeal concerning the deductibility of land costs. The assessee, a real estate firm, had debited a significant amount related to assets transferred to work-in-progress in its profit and loss account. This expense related to land used for parking facilities provided to shop owners within a constructed mall. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) had disallowed this expense, a decision that the assessee appealed.

Court :
ITAT Delhi

Brief :
This appeal is filed by M/s Crown international, assessee- Appellant for assessment year 2014 – 15 against the order passed by THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A) – 14, New Delhi [ The ld CIT (A) ] dated 14/01/2019 wherein the addition made by the learned The Assistant Commissioner of Income tax , Circle 41(1), New Delhi [ the ld AO] of ₹ 37,909,943/– is confirmed. Though assessee has raised a very argumentative and detailed grounds of appeal however the solitary issue remains is a disallowance of expenditure of ₹ 37,909,943/– made by the learned assessing officer and confirmed by the learned CIT – A.

Citation :
ITA. No. 2531/Del/2019

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCH “B”
NEW DELHI

BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
&
SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
(Through Video Conferencing)

ITA. No. 2531/Del/2019
(Assessment Year: 2014-15)

M/s. Crown International
C-99 Ekta Vihar
Jaitpur Extension
Part -1
Delhi 14
PAN :- AADFC 1985B
(Appellant) 

Vs.

The Assistant
Commissioner of Income Tax
Circle 41 (1)
New Delhi
(Respondent)

Assessee by : Shri V K Shabarwal Adv
alongwith Shri Ashok Babbar
Adv ,
Rakesh Chaddha CA
Department by: Shri Mahesh Thakur SR DR

Date of Hearing : 12/05/2021
Date of pronouncement : 18/05/2021

O R D E R

PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, A. M.

01. This appeal is filed by M/s Crown international, assessee- Appellant for assessment year 2014 – 15 against the order passed by THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A) – 14, New Delhi [ The ld CIT (A) ] dated 14/01/2019 wherein the addition made by the learned The Assistant Commissioner of Income tax , Circle 41(1), New Delhi [ the ld AO] of ₹ 37,909,943/– is confirmed. Though assessee has raised a very argumentative and detailed grounds of appeal however the solitary issue remains is a disallowance of expenditure of ₹ 37,909,943/– made by the learned assessing officer and confirmed by the learned CIT – A.

02. Brief facts of the case shows that assessee is a partnership firm engaged in the business of real estate and renting of properties. The total income of the assessee comprises of income from business and profession. Assessee has filed its return of income declaring income of ₹ 71,531,420/– on 31/11/2014. The case of the assessee was selected for limited scrutiny to examine mismatch in profit before tax as per profit and loss account and schedule BP, high interest expenditure against capital shown in the working progress et cetera.

03. On issue of various statutory notices by the learned assessing officer and details filed by the assessee, the learned AO noted that assessee has debited expense of ₹ 37,909,943/– in the profit and loss account on account of assets transferred to work in progress. In fact, on looking at the accounting treatment assessee has claimed this amount as deductible expenses. The facts stated that assessee has constructed a shopping mall on a plot having an area of 13,129 yd². It had an open area of 65% i.e. 8534 yd² and the remaining area was constructed portion. 

To know more in details find the attachment file

FAQ :

The main issue was whether the assessee could claim a deduction for the cost of land that was subsequently provided as parking space to shop owners.

The assessee was a partnership firm engaged in the business of real estate and renting of properties.

An expense of ₹37,909,943 was disallowed by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A).

The expense related to assets transferred to work-in-progress, specifically concerning land used for parking facilities at a shopping mall.

The shopping mall was constructed on a plot of 13,129 square yards.

 



Judgement posted by

Guest

Comments




CCI Pro



Company
ARTICLESHIP 16 September 2026
CA Article Trainee

SR BAGAI & Co.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 October 2026
Article assistant

S.K.Bajpai & Co.

Noida

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 12 September 2026
Assistant Manager - Finance & Compliance

Naveen Fintech Pvt Ltd

Kolkata

CA Inter

View Details
Company
20 September 2026
Semi Qualified CA

Navin & Associates

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
26 September 2026
Chartered Accountant

pushpganga ventures

Pune

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 18 September 2026
Industrial Trainee

Twenty Point Nine Five Ventures Private Limited

Noida

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 October 2026
Article Trainee/ CMA Trainee

RMA And Associates LLP

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 08 October 2026
ARTICLE TRAINEE

S.B.G. & CO. CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details