Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

Heard Mr. Manish Bhatt, learned senior counsel, appearing with Mrs. Mauna Bhatt, learned advocate for the applicant, Ms. Yajnik, learned advocate for the respondent No.1-OL and Mr. Rutvij Bhatt, learned advocate for the respondent No.2. 2. From

This appeal is directed against the Tribunal’s order dated 19th May, 2006 for the block assessment period 1.4.1988 to 14.10.1998. The main issue raised is in respect of the deletion by the CIT(A) and the Tribunal of the addition of about ` 51.52 lacs

Write Petition No 19760/2011 & Write Petition No 20485-89/2011 are filed under Article 226 & 227 of the constitution of India, praying to quash the notice dated 23.05.2011issued by the 2nd Respondent vide D, D1, D2, D3, D4 and D5 dated 15.03.2011an

This is an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, “the ct”) against the order dated 25.4.2008 passed by learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“the Tribunal” for short) in Appeal No.1056/DEL/2006 for the assessment year 20

This W.P filed prayed to quash the Impugned Order of CAT Dated 17th August 2005 at Annexure F and dated 24.10.2005 at Annexure Gin so far as petitioner is concerned and direction to Respondent 1 to 4 not to disturbed the 11 SC category officers who w

This W.P. is filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated 21.07.2008 passed by the CAT in O.A.No 55/2007 After arguing the matter at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submit that O.A. No 55/2

On 24 November 2005 the Central Board of Excise and Customs issued a circular providing for the introduction of a Risk Management System (RMS) with an Accredited Clients Programme (ACP) as its major component. The object of the programme is to grant

Whether expenditure (including interest paid on funds borrowed) in respect of investment in shares of operating companies for acquiring and retaining a controlling interest therein is hit by section 14A of the Income tax Act, 1961 inasmuch as the div

The Government of Maharashtra, by Resolutions dated 16.10.1970 and 18.11.1974, had granted lease of certain plots of land to the defendant-Company at Backbay Reclamation, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, who was entitled and authorized to enter into transaction

The present appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) has been preferred by Sood Brij & Associates, a partnership firm, consisting of two partners namely A.K. Sood and B.M. Gupta, who are practicing Chartered Accountants.