Addition u/s 69C of the Income Tax Act on account of unexplained expenditure deleted by AO

Last updated: 19 July 2021
Quick Summary
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted an addition of Rs. 10,76,146 made under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act for unexplained expenditure. The addition was based on information from the Sales-tax Department alleging the assessee had used bogus purchase entries. However, the ITAT followed its previous ruling in the assessee's own case for an earlier assessment year, where it was held that the Assessing Officer must disprove the evidence provided by the assessee rather than relying on conjectures.

Court :
ITAT Mumbai

Brief :
This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-29 dated 30.08.2019 and pertains to Assessment Year 2010-11.

Citation :
I.T.A. No. 6758/Mum/2019

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Community
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
  • Profile Visitors
  • Link Social Profiles
  • Featured Job Posts
  • Pro Badge
  • Expert GST Guidance
  • Unlimited Forum Replies
  • Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)

BEST VALUE
2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)

3 Months PLAN
999
(Excl. of GST ₹179)

View all CCI PRO benefits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Guest
Published in Income Tax
Views : 1205
Share Report Abuse
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. CESTAT: Rajasthan Sales Tax Subsidy under RIPS 2010 Not includible in Excise Assessable Value
  2. CESTAT: Late Payment Charges in the Nature of Interest Not Taxable as Declared Service
  3. CESTAT: Educational Services Exempt Under Section 66D; Extended Period Cannot Be Invoked Without Wilful Suppression
  4. CESTAT: No Service Tax on Royalty under RCM if Mining Lease Was Executed Before 1 April 2016
  5. No pre-deposit required for filing appeal before the GSTAT against penalty-only orders where proceedings commenced prior to October 01 2025
  6. Refund cannot be withheld under Section 54(11) of the CGST Act merely because the Revenue contemplates filing an appeal
  7. Scope of Rectification under Section 161 of the CGST Act is Confined to Errors Apparent on the Face of Record
  8. Appellate Authority has no power to condone delay in filing appeal beyond the outer limit prescribed under Section 107(4) of the CGST Act
  9. CESTAT New Delhi: Sub-Contractor Separately Liable for Service Tax Regardless of Main Contractor's Discharge
  10. Cenvat Credit Cannot Be Denied Merely on Third-Party Statements Without Corroborative Evidence

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member swaminathanswaminathanPro Member Ankit MehtaAnkit MehtaPro Member Deepak WadhwaDeepak WadhwaPro Member shashishashiPro Member yogesh koraniyogesh korani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category




Latest Job Openings

View all
Company
25 August 2026
Senior Accountant

MG Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
09 September 2026
SENIOR AUDITOR & ACCOUNTS MANAGER

Anupam Parashar & Co.

Ghaziabad

CA Final

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 01 September 2026
Articles

Saini Pati Shah & Co LLP, Chartered Accountants

Mumbai

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 September 2026
CA Articles

Kothari Jain Patil & Chartered Accountants

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 01 September 2026
Article Assistant

SGNG & Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 September 2026
Article/ Paid Assistant

Murali and Sumeet Chartered Accountant

Bengaluru

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 04 September 2026
Accounts Executive

Hema Yashwanth & Associates

Chennai

B.Com

View Details
Company
09 September 2026
Chartered Accountant

Aviv Global Private Limited

Ahmedabad

CA

View Details