which answer is correct

683 views 1 replies

Vinod Gupta Module VS ICAI suggested

 

Question-X had taken a loan under registered mortgage deed dated 16-07-00 against the house, which
was purchased by him on 26-03-81 for Rs.5 lakhs. The said property was inherited by his son
`A' under will who for obtaining a clear title thereof had paid the outstanding amount of loan on
12-02-03 of Rs.15 lakhs. The said house property was sold by `A' on 16-03-03 for Rs.50
lakhs. State with reasons the amount chargeable to capital gains for A.Y. 2003-04

Solution-In ICAI Suggested 

Sale consideration of house property 50,00,000
Less:
Indexed cost of acquisition (see Note below)
(i) Cost to previous owner – no indexation is given on the
assumption that the asset was sold in the same year in
which it was inherited as per Will.
                                                                                                                                      5,00,000
(ii) Loan amount paid by Mr. A
(Benefit of CII not available on the assumption that the loan
amount was paid in the year of sale) 15,00,000                                               20,00,000
Capital gains                                                                                                            30,00,000
Note: Since the property was acquired by Mr. A through inheritance, the cost of acquisition to
A will be cost to the previous owner. However, indexation will be from the year in which the
assessee i.e. ‘A’ in this case, first held the asset. It has been assumed that the property was
inherited by ‘A’ and loan was paid off in the same year and was sold during the previous year
2009-10.

in VINOD GUPTA module it is given that CII FOR 1-4-81 should be taken i.e.,100..which logically seems correct coz when for period of holding we use previous owner time then why CII should not be considered for 81 then for when last owner first held?
 

Replies (1)

 

Follow ICAI Solution...!!!!!!!!

For More Details Please Visit ....

click for

TAX PLANNING FOR CAPITAL GAINS

 

 

Where the property has been mortgaged by the previous owner during his lifetime and the assessee, after inheriting the same, has discharged the mortgage debt, the amount paid by him for the purpose of clearing off the mortgage shall be regarded as cost of acquisition under section 48 read with section 55(2) of the Act. [Arunachalam (RM) v CIT (1997) 227 ITR 222 (SC)] The position is, however, different where the mortgage is created by the owner after he has acquired the property. The clearing off of the mortgage debt by him prior to transfer of the property would not entitle him to claim deduction under section 48 of the Act because in such a case he did not acquire any interest in the property subsequent to his acquiring the same. [Jagadish Chandran (V.S.M.R.) v CIT (1997) 227 ITR 240 (SC)].

 


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
26 May 2026
Audit executive

vdsr & co LLP

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
29 May 2026
Accounts assistant

Shubh Consultancy

Mumbai

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
22 May 2026
Sr. Financial Analyst - Consolidation

Search Synergy

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
04 June 2026
Semi Qualified CA

Goyal Puneet & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
12 June 2026
Accounts & Taxation Executive

Winshine Financial Services

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
09 June 2026
Accounts Associate

S Madan and CO

New Delhi

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 18 June 2026
Article Assistance

RB KESHRI & CO.

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 15 June 2026
Senior Auditor

N. Dhawan & Co

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details