STUDENTS FEEL CHEATED BY ICAI - PLEASE SHARE YOUR GRIEVANCES

Announcement 1877 views 10 replies

TREACHERY, ya thats a perfect word to summarise ICAI notification of AS-30, 31 and 32

The below was conveyed as per the notification:

 

Queries are being received from various quarters as to whether in today’s context, Accounting Standard(AS)-30, Accounting Standard(AS)-31 and Accounting Standard(AS)-32 are required to be studied thoroughly for the examinations of the Institute, as they are included in the respective syllabus.

In regard to above, it is clarified for guidance of students that while students are required to be conversant with the concepts like types of assets, definitions etc, however, they are not required to be thorough with the application part of the standard, in view of the complexities involved, for May 2010 Exam .

 

In contrast to the above, they have asked Hedge Accounting (Question) Q3(b) -  6 marks, which is on application of hedge accounting. I presume, another question Q4(b) on Interest Rate Amortisation which is of 8 marks, does come under the perview of AS -30, as earlier guidance notes on the same stands widtthdrawn.

 

So, I request to all the students, to strongly condemn the ICAI move of misguiding/misleading students and express your grievances/feedback. We shall take this forward to the ICAI, and bring the same to the notice of ICAI.

 

Remember your contibution will help all of us. I urge all of you to come forward and make this initiative (a fight for our justice) a concrete one.

 

I shall  take this forward to the council (after exam and keep you posted) and with your help, it will bring justice. Let's make this a movement. PLS we need to be united on this issue.




Replies (10)

Really all must go against this .

They have asked AS 30 in CA final NEW Course also. Hope we get marks for having attempted.

i 2 got betrayed and i support this intiative n one more thing thr is an error in prblm 5 ..its not 12500*100,it is 125000*100(goodwill).. no one corrected us

The agony is that they should not have circulated the notification. Why does institute wants to be extra-smart. As my friend said (Gowrish), hope we get marks having attempted the question, what about students who have not. Even they feel cheated like us.

Problem is how can the grievances become effective when no power or even complaint mechanism is there for the students.

We are all with you Mr. Jigar but history speaks clearly. Nothing has shaken the walls.

Hope by your efforts we get to see a change!!..

cent % agree with vansh, d most harshest of d words used 4icai are less,. i know dat students need to know d relvnt as as specified by institute, bt never trust them they can ask anything in any paper. inspite of their notification best way out is 2ignore their so called suggestions and study 100%.

a true example would be pcc paper of nov 2008, inspite of mentioning as 18 is not applicable to pcc nov 08 students in rtp for that attempt and d module itself, still d question was asked, (don't believe me then check it out urself), i wrote a mail 2instiute on d said matter, bt i guess it was deleted just by seeing d subject matter of it... no solution guys, institute is treating us like fools, it's time 2wake up and make d institute esp. d exam committe understand dat students future can't b taken 4a ride.

Jigar Bhai,


Wish you all the best for all your efforts, but circular its self is not clear and fighting with ICAI on the same is not advicable by me.

Forget about last paper & concentrate on next paper.

well after reading all your comments and my personal experience  i strongly feel that ICAI isn't interested in passing us anymore. well one day i think ICAI will put up a notification reading NO MORE CA's ALLOWED

i second jigar

 

should do something

 

atleast express our anguish.................


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register