There are some provisions of Companies Act 1956, requires Signing of Balance Sheet by Company Secretary.
cases are as under:
1. By signing the annual accounts, a Company Secretary does not incur liability for wrong entries in the books of account or falsification of accounts. Section 215 does not seek to create a liability only for those who sign the accounts. The purpose of section 215 seems to be what is stated in its heading, namely authentication of balance sheet and profit and loss account. As rightly stated by the MCA in its circular No. 7 of 1972, dated 12 May, 1972, that the authentication by the Secretary is "on behalf of the board of directors" and not in his personal capacity, the Secretary can be held responsible regarding errors etc only as an "officer" of the company within the meaning of section 628 and not because of authentication by him under section 215 as such.
2. Where, however, the Secretary is charged with the responsibility of maintaining the accounts and also assisting the auditor at the time of auditing, he cannot conceivably escape consequences of any wrong statement in the accounts. The signatories to the annual accounts sign them 'on behalf of the board of directors' vide section 215(1) and (3).
3. Further sub-section (3) expressly provides that the Financial Statements shall be 'approved by the Board' before they are signed on its behalf. This makes it clear that if any liability arises out of the Financial Statements it should attach to all the directors (besides the Secretary) who approve them. Sections 209, 211, 212, etc. which relates to Financial Statements of the company and 'true and fair view' contain specific penal provisions in regard to any default in complying with the requirements of those sections. A Company Secretary in his capacity as Secretary cannot approve the accounts under the extant Act.
4. So far as the penal liability under section 628 is concerned, mens rea is an essential ingredient of this provision. Before any person is convicted of an offence under this section it will have to be, therefore, established that such person has made a false statement, or omitted any material fact, 'knowingly'. "
You can act accordingly in view of above provisions.All the queries are welcomed at siyansh.vns @ gmail.com.
Regards,
Siya