Services Tax Matter 26 AS vs ST 3 Return Difference

277 views 1 replies
Hi team

I need your help. My one of client received services tax show cause notice in aug 2019 by email.for the F Y 13 14 and FY 14 -15 on basis of 26AS and ST 3 return difference.
This email was received on constultant email not received on client email.

Client has not reply to notices nor submitted any documents to department
Client has closed office on 2016 hences all physical notice return to department
Hences they are calling for this matter in this month

I want to know from your opinion on this case
what's is time limit for department can pass Order in services tax Matters for F Y 13-14 and 14-15 or already time barr 5 year Completed.

Thanks
Replies (1)

Hi Manohar,

Regarding your client’s service tax show cause notice for FY 2013-14 and 2014-15, here’s a detailed explanation on the limitation period and how to handle the issue:


1. Limitation Period for Service Tax Assessments / Show Cause Notices

  • Under Section 73 or 73A of the Finance Act, 1994 (Service Tax law), the limitation period for issuance of show cause notices for service tax demands is generally 3 years from the relevant date.

  • However, in some cases like suppression of facts or fraud, the department can issue notice up to 5 years(extended period).


2. Relevant Date for Limitation

  • The relevant date is usually the due date of filing of the return or payment of service tax.

  • For example, for FY 2013-14, the last return filing and payment was likely by June or September 2014.

  • So, the normal limitation period of 3 years would expire by around 2017.

  • For extended 5 years, it would expire by 2019.


3. Status of Time Bar

  • Since the notice was received in August 2019 for FY 13-14 and 14-15, it is likely that the 5-year extended limitation period is near expiry or just expired.

  • But the department may allege suppression or fraud to keep the case alive beyond 5 years.

  • Check if there are any proceedings initiated earlier or demand orders passed that can extend limitation.


4. Effect of Email Notice on Consultant’s Email

  • Notice served on consultant’s email, not client’s email, is generally valid if the consultant is authorized representative.

  • If no physical notice served, and client was unaware, the department can argue that service of notice is proper through electronic means.

  • Client should verify whether consultant had authority and check communication trail.


5. Next Steps / Suggestions

  • Review if any return was filed or payment made for those years.

  • Check if the demand raised in notice is genuine and supported by records (like mismatch in 26AS and ST3).

  • Consider filing reply and documents promptly to avoid ex parte order.

  • Client can also file request for condonation of delay if time-barred and explain closure of office.

  • If truly time-barred, client can raise limitation defense during hearings or in reply.


6. Summary

Aspect Explanation
Limitation period Generally 3 years, extendable to 5 years for fraud/suppression.
FY 13-14 and 14-15 Likely nearing or beyond 5 years in August 2019.
Notice on consultant email Valid if authorized representative.
Recommended action Respond quickly, verify records, consider limitation defense.


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register