could ny1 explain me the statement "though wagering contract is void, transactions coincidental to wagering transactions are not void"
Menu
Law
Replies (1)
wagering agreement
A and B bet as to whether it would rain on a particular day or not A promising to pay Rs. 100 to B if it rained, and B promising an equal amount to A, if it did not. This agreement is wager.
matter coincidental to wagering contract
A borrows Rs. 500 from B to pay to C, to whom B has lost a bet. Contract between A and B is valid.contract between B & C is wagering contract & hence void.But contract between A & B is matter coincidental to awgering contract hence valid
hope u understand
Recent Topics :
- Free CA Foundation Study Material - PYQs with Sugg
- INCOME TAX
- Moving from old to new tax regime after notice
- Need urgent help on notice
- ITR-3 - F&O Loss adjusted against business inc
- Error - Blank Rows in Schedule SI (ITR-2)
- Dividend from co-operative society
- SECTION 139(10) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 CASE
- TDS u/s.194C returns filed in ITR-1
- TDS on Property - Form 26QB Related
Related Topics :
CAclubindia
