Insolvency and Bankaruptcy code

Section 238 of IBC code,2016 which is a non obstante clause gives IBC overiding powers over all other Acts which means while following provisions of IBC any provision in any other law which is repugnant to provisions of IBC SHALL NOT HAVE EFFECT.
The liquidator appointed under IBC have to see 2 possibilities whether there is chance of revival under IBC and if that fails he will push the co. in winding up and when doing so all repugnant provisions in any other law shall be void
however if he proposes to go for compromise or arrangement u/s230 of Companies Act,2013 he is allowed to do so as he is opting out of iBC and going for provisions of companies act,2013 so there is no issues of contradiction.Also rules of Companies(Compromise,arrangemeng,amagamation),2016 has provided the defination of Liquidator which means LIQUIDATOR APPOINTED UNDER THE ACT OR UNDER THE IBC CODE,2016 which means the liquidator appointed under ibc is allowed to file petition of compro and arrangements u/s230.
conclusion-section 230 of CA,2013 will remain valid if liquidator so appointed under iBC choses to opt out of ibc and go for sectio 230.
I have answered this question to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Hope this answer will satisfy your querry.
thanks

is there any provision in IBC that gives powers to liquidator to invoke provisions of companies act, 2013 i.e section 230

IBC code neither authorises nor prohibit the liquidator from invoking the provisions of section 230 of Ca,2013.Also,NEW RULES of companies(compro,arrange and amalg),2016 are made in HARMONY with IBC code.
IBC are conferred wirh huge powers and it is made in favour of creditors and harsh for companies
creditors at present are more prefering for ibc for recovering their whole claim rather than going into compromise or arrangment with companies where they have to sacrifice some part of claim.
And also check for new cases under ibc hope you find full proof answers there.
thanks

thank for your clarification.