GSTR-1 Export Invoice - Partial Payment Query

Holla, need quick clarification on GSTR-1 filing for export under LUT:

Situation:

  • Invoice: $907 USD (June 26, 2025)
  • Received: Only $500 USD (July 10, 2025)
  • Outstanding: $407 USD (client financial issues)

My Action: Filed GSTR-1 for June with ₹42,876 (converted $500 at June 26 rate) in Table 6A

Questions:

  1. Correct to report only received amount vs full invoice value?
  2. If remaining $407 received later - how to fill the supplementary GSTR-1 for that month?
  3. If it becomes bad debt - any special GST treatment needed?

Export under LUT, all documentation proper.

Thanks!

 
Replies (3)
Quick Summary
This discussion clarifies how to report export invoices on GSTR-1 when only partial payment has been received under LUT. The consensus is that for exports under LUT, you should report the full invoice value in Table 6A for the month the invoice was issued, irrespective of the payment received. The actual realisation of foreign exchange, governed by RBI guidelines, is a separate process that becomes relevant if the full payment isn't realised within the stipulated timeframe, potentially requiring ITC reversal.

You need to show full invoiced amount in GSTR1. If later the amount become bad debt then you can file credit note.

Let me know if you want any other help.

ca.ajaakarshjain16 @ gmail.com

9760

100302

This is what I found from chatgpt .. what is correct then ?

 

**CA Aakarsh Jain's Response is INCORRECT for LUT Exports**

 

The CA's advice to "show full invoiced amount in GSTR-1" applies to **domestic supplies**, not **LUT exports**.

 

**Key Difference:**

- **Domestic Sales:** Report full invoice value regardless of payment status

- **LUT Exports:** Report only actual foreign exchange received/realized

 

**Why Your Approach is Correct:**

1. **RBI Guidelines:** Export realization principle - report only actual forex received

2. **CBIC Clarification:** For LUT exports, GSTR-1 should reflect actual export proceeds

3. **Practical Compliance:** Export data matches with bank realization certificates

 

**What happens if you follow the CA's advice:**

- GSTR-1 shows ₹75,000+ (full $907)

- Bank realization certificate shows only ₹42,876 ($500)

- Creates mismatch in export documentation

- Potential issues during export incentive claims

 

**Recommendation:**

Your original approach is correct. For LUT exports, report actual realization amounts, not full invoice values. If you're unsure, consult a CA specialized in **export procedures** rather than general GST practice.

 

The distinction between domestic and export invoicing is crucial here.

Under LUT, GSTR-1 reporting is invoice-based rather than payment-based. You report the full invoice value in Table 6A (zero-rated exports without IGST) for the month in which you raised the invoice, regardless of whether partial or full payment has been received. The RBI's 9-month window for realising export proceeds runs in parallel with GST and does not change what you report in GSTR-1. Where it becomes important is if the realisation deadline passes without full payment, as you may need to reverse ITC proportionally in that scenario.
For a full walkthrough of Table 6A reporting for exports, see our [GSTR-1 filing guide](https://taxgarden.in/blog/gstr-1-filing-guide-outward-supplies-return-india).

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register