pankaj agarwal (MBA) (29 Points)
26 July 2013I have a pvt limited company whose only source of income is via an institutional IT space given on rent.
My question is which head to treat this income in? business or property? If property, then how do i claim regular company expenses like salary, maintenance, postage, marketing cost etc?
Gowtham
(Student CA IPC / IPCC)
(119 Points)
Replied 26 July 2013
Treat as income from business main object of the company is earning income from rent
Mihir
(Wealth Manager)
(5293 Points)
Replied 26 July 2013
If letting out premises on rent is the only business, then treat it as business income and avail deductions for expenditure incurred.
vijisha
(Article assistant)
(25 Points)
Replied 26 July 2013
if the objective of the co in MOA is to leting out then letting out is the businessincome
other wise ie if the cos objective is something other and if the cos present income is only rent then income from house property
pankaj agarwal
(MBA)
(29 Points)
Replied 26 July 2013
If i treat it as business income, will i get indexation benefit while calculating capital gain at the time of sale of the said property?
Swami Ayyappa Nuli
(TAX ADVISOR & CONSULTANT AT G.S.T SUVIDHA CENTER)
(1372 Points)
Replied 26 July 2013
It is an asset used for ur Business.since it is capital asset u will claim depreciation every year.for depreciable asset,Gain shall always be short term Capital Gain aswell Indexation benifit will not apply!
kavita aggarwal
(. )
(135 Points)
Replied 26 July 2013
Mahavir Jain
(Student CA IPC / IPCC)
(28 Points)
Replied 27 July 2013
Omkar Shirsat
(CA Final Student)
(72 Points)
Replied 27 July 2013
Dear Mr. Pankaj,
If the object clause of the company mentions "Letting Of Property" as the main business of the company, then such property (Institutional IT Space in your case) shall be treated as goods for the business and not Capital Asset. Hence, rental income form such property is Business Income.
However, if Letting of property is not the primary business, then the property is an Investment/Capital asset. Therfore, income from such property shall be Income From House Property as far as Taxation is Concerned. In case of accountancy, the income shall be purely income from rent. Thats it.
Correct me if i am wrong.
El Savador
(Self Employed)
(22 Points)
Replied 27 July 2013
| Originally posted by : Omkar Shirsat | ||
 |
Dear Mr. Pankaj, If the object clause of the company mentions "Letting Of Property" as the main business of the company, then such property (Institutional IT Space in your case) shall be treated as goods for the business and not Capital Asset. Hence, rental income form such property is Business Income. However, if Letting of property is not the primary business, then the property is an Investment/Capital asset. Therfore, income from such property shall be Income From House Property as far as Taxation is Concerned. In case of accountancy, the income shall be purely income from rent. Thats it. Correct me if i am wrong. |
 |
C.A. Jignesh N. Mehta
(C.A.)
(1030 Points)
Replied 28 July 2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Judgment delivered on: 17.05.2013 + ITA 238/2013
+ ITA 239/2013
+ ITA 240/2013
NEW DELHI HOTELS LTD ... Appellant versus
ACIT ... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Appellant : Mr Anoop Sharma For the Respondent : Mr Abhishekh Maratha CORAM:-
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
JUDGMENT
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL)
1. The present appeals have been filed on behalf of the assessee under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the "said Act") challenging the order dated 07.12.2012 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal had, by the order dated 07.12.2012, disposed of three appeals being ITA Nos. 3742/DEL/2012, 3743/DEL/2012 and 1462/DEL/2012 which had been preferred by the ITA Nos. 238/13,239/13&240/13 Page 1 of 4 revenue relating to the assessment year 2004-05, 2009-10 and 2008-09, respectively.
2. These appeals raise a common question and thus, have been taken up together.
3. The issue sought to be raised in the present appeals is:- "Whether the rental income derived from the unsold flats which are shown as stock-in-trade in the books of the appellant/assessee would fall within the head "Profits and gains from business and profession" or under the head, "income from house property".
4. The Tribunal held that it would fall under the head of "profits and gains from business and profession", whereas it is the appellant/assessee's contention that it would fall within the head "income from house property". It appears that this issue is no longer debatable in view of the decision in the case of CIT v Ansal Housing Finance & Leasing Co. Ltd. decided on 31.10.2012 in ITA No. 18/1999. That decision has, subsequently, been followed in CIT v. Discovery Estates Pvt. Ltd (in ITA Nos. 1089/11 and 1090/2011) and CIT v. Discovery Holding Pvt. Ltd. (in ITA No. 1097/2011) decided on 18.02.2013. One of the questions raised in Discovery Estates Pvt. Ltd and Discovery Holding Pvt. Ltd (supra) was "whether the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the rental income should be assessed in the income from the business and not under the head "income from house property"?" This court answered that question in the negative by ITA Nos. 238/13,239/13&240/13 Page 2 of 4 following the decision in the case of Ansal Housing Finance & Leasing Co. Ltd (supra).
5. Mr Maratha appearing on behalf of the revenue contended that Ansal Housing Finance & Leasing Co. Ltd (supra) was a decision where the question was with regard to deemed rent on the basis of annual letting value (ALV) whereas in the present appeals, the issue is with regard to the actual rent received in respect of flats let out by the appellant/assessee. However, we find that in Discovery Estates Pvt. Ltd and Discovery Holding Pvt. Ltd (supra) the issue was in the backdrop of actual rent receipts and not on the basis of deemed rent. Therefore, the decision of this court in Discovery Estates Pvt. Ltd and Discovery Holding Pvt. Ltd (supra) would govern the present case also.
6. Consequently, while framing the question as to whether the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that rental income should be assessed under the head of "profits and gains from business and profession" and not under the head "income from house property", we answer the same in the negative. We may add, however, that the learned counsel for the appellant had also taken the plea of consistency ITA Nos. 238/13,239/13&240/13 Page 3 of 4 but, we have not examined the same as it was not necessary for us to do so because of the position indicated above.
7. These appeals are allowed as above.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
MAY 17, 2013
kb
ITA Nos. 238/13,239/13&240/13 Page 4 of 4
The Case Law is very clear.... There are many such case laws and The Income Tax Act is very clear that is the property is rented out then the rental income shall by all means be treated as Income From House Property in all possible terms - Income Tax Act.
In case you need any further clarification, then please ask.
GST Live Certification Course (39th Batch) - April 2024 (Weekend Batch) (With Certificate)
"Live class on Python for Financial Analysis: Unlocking Efficiency in Accounting and Finance"
CAclubindia
