Form INC-28

MCA in its notification dated 6th March, 2020 has issued a clarification on statutory compliances under CIRP in supersession to earlier circular dated 17th February, 2020, this notification mandated all IRP/RP to file INC-28 of every company which was under CIRP prior to this circular.

Master Data of these companies already reflect the status as “Under CIRP”, still in pursuance of this notification, I am filing Form INC-28 of the company which was under CIRP prior to this circular and in challan copy of Form INC-28, I see the wording as “Filing is not done within due date, condonation of delay is required in this case”

There was no requirement to file Form INC-28 at the time of receipt of NCLT order, even INC-28 was also not updated that time and an option to file NCLT order was not reflected in INC-28 at the time of receipt of NCLT order, then why should I go for condonation of delay ?

MCA has delayed in issuing this notification so should I make condonation because of delay done by MCA ? besides Form INC-28 is also in the list of additional fee waiver given by MCA due to covid-19 so why waiver to condone delay due to covid-19 is not given by MCA ?

Replies (2)
Quick Summary
This discussion addresses confusion surrounding the filing of Form INC-28 for companies under Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) following an MCA notification. The user questions the necessity of condoning delays when the MCA's own notification was issued after the initial compliance window. They also highlight the inconsistency of being asked to file a delayed form when the filing portal was not updated at the time, and question why COVID-19 related waivers don't extend to this specific delay.

Which date have you mentioned as date of event ?

date of event is date of receipt of order

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register