DRC-01 Demand Notice for filing GSTR-9 Wrongly

Hello,

I self file GST returns, I filed GSTR-9 erroneously for FY 21-22 without expert knowledge & not filling ITC values, thinking its mandatory even though my turn over is less than 2 crores.

Now, GST officer sent notice under DRC-01 with excess ITC claimed tax demand payment,  solely based on this GSTR-9 return and demanding that I claimed excess tax credit in GSTR-3B as its not matching with GSTR-9.

Does this demand legally valid? As per GST notification this return is not mandatory for me. 

How to reply to this notice? Please, advice.

Replies (3)
Quick Summary
A taxpayer filed GSTR-9 for FY 21-22 despite their turnover being below ₹2 crores, making the return non-mandatory. The GST officer issued a DRC-01 notice demanding payment for excess ITC claimed, based solely on the GSTR-9 discrepancies with GSTR-3B. The advice suggests the demand may not be legally valid as GSTR-9 was optional and GSTR-3B is the primary return, recommending a formal reply with supporting documents like turnover proof and GSTR-3B filings.

The situation you're facing involves a notice under DRC-01 for excess ITC claimed, based on discrepancies between GSTR-3B and GSTR-9. Given that your turnover is less than ₹2 crores and GSTR-9 is not mandatory for you, here's how to approach this: Validity of Demand -

*Non-Mandatory Return*: Since GSTR-9 is not mandatory for taxpayers with aggregate turnover below ₹2 crores, the demand based solely on this return may not be legally valid. -

 *GSTR-3B Prevails*: GSTR-3B is the primary return for monthly tax liability, and ITC claims should be based on this return.

Reply to Notice

1. *Acknowledge the Notice*: Respond to the notice, acknowledging the demand and explaining the situation. 

2. *Explain Non-Mandatory GSTR-9*: Clarify that GSTR-9 is not mandatory for taxpayers with turnover below ₹2 crores and that GSTR-3B is the primary return for tax liability.

 3. *Provide Correct Information*: Submit the correct information based on GSTR-3B, highlighting the ITC claims and tax liability. .

4. 

*Request Reconsideration*: Request the GST officer to reconsider the demand based on GSTR-3B. Supporting Documents - 

*Turnover Proof*: Provide proof of turnover below ₹2 crores for the relevant financial year. - *GSTR-3B Returns*: Submit copies of GSTR-3B returns filed for the relevant period. Additional Advice - 

*Consult a GST Expert*: Consider consulting a GST expert or a chartered accountant to ensure a proper response and to avoid any potential issues. -

 *Timely Response*: Respond to the notice within the specified timeframe to avoid any further complications. By following these steps, you can effectively respond to the notice and potentially resolve the issue [1].

I have replied to the claim as per your suggestions but the GST officer didn't accept the legality of GSTR-9 if turnover is less than 2 crores & issued show cause notice.

They are still demanding the ITC difference based soley on GSTR-9 and asking for supporting documents etc.

The ITC claimed is less than the ITC available in GSTR-2B but still GST Officer is not considering it.

A DRC-01 is the formal GST demand for the tax shortfall the department found by comparing your GSTR-9 against GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B. You have 30 days from the notice date to act: if you agree with the amount, pay the tax and interest via DRC-03 and no penalty applies under Section 73(8).

 If the demand looks wrong, file a reply in DRC-06 with supporting documents explaining the discrepancy. Either way, do not ignore the 30-day window as missing it brings a 10-15% penalty on top.

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Follow