Disallowability of expenses U/s 40 A (3) of I.T. Act

Tax queries 1104 views 10 replies

Please provide your expert opnion:

X Co. has given a contract for construction of factory to  A Co. (contractor).
X Co. purchased some TMT bars (construction materials) of Rs. 80,000/- in cash from a single party on a single day on behalf of A Co. and debited the account of A Co. in its books of accounts and credited cash. The bills and other documents are in the name of A Co.

I seek your opinion that whether the provisions of Sec. 40 A (3) of I.T. Act are attracted, if yes who of the two parties would be disallowed...??

Replies (10)

 

yes provisions of sec. 40A (3) will attract because you can not pay more than 20000/- in a single day.

In my openion the provisions will apply to the company making payment i.e. X co.

Sir,

Please clarify with supporting text from the Section..

for X co.. expenditure will bw disallowed.. because he has made payment to the party on behalf of  A co.. In A co expenditure is allowed

 

It is a capital expenditure,so no question of allowing and disallowing of expenses under 40 A (3) of I.T. Act

Under section 40A(3)Expenses are disallowed if payment is made violating the rules, like payment in cash. Purchase of TMT bar is not a revenue expense to claim. Because it is a capital expenditure which is capitalized to asset there is no relevance of section 40A(3).

Super like for sunil.

Originally posted by : Sunil Kumar V.Peruru
Under section 40A(3)Expenses are disallowed if payment is made violating the rules, like payment in cash. Purchase of TMT bar is not a revenue expense to claim. Because it is a capital expenditure which is capitalized to asset there is no relevance of section 40A(3).

Agree with Mr. sunil

AGREE WITH SUNIL

 

Proportinate Depreciation will be disallowed in Assessment by IT Authority


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register