Dear Sir/Madam,
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to seek clarification on the applicability of Notification No. 48/2017-Central Tax, dated 18.10.2017, and Circular No. 14/14/2017-GST, dated 06.11.2017, specifically concerning the treatment of a supply of goods from one Export Oriented Unit (EOU) to another EOU.
Notification No. 48/2017-Central Tax notifies "supply of goods by a registered person to an EOU" as a deemed export. Given that an EOU is also a "registered person" under the GST Act, a literal interpretation suggests that a supply from one EOU (as a supplier) to another EOU (as a recipient) should qualify as a deemed export.
The deemed export provision under Section 147 and Notification No. 48/2017-Central Tax was created for a very specific purpose: to provide a level playing field for domestic suppliers and the same is stated in Chapter 7, of the Foreign Trade Policy 2023: "
However, the procedural framework outlined in Circular No. 14/14/2017-GST, particularly the requirement for prior intimation in Form A and the endorsement of the invoice, seems to be primarily designed for DTA-to-EOU supplies, creating an ambiguity. This ambiguity leads to practical difficulties in determining the eligibility for a refund of GST paid on such supplies, as the refund mechanism under the deemed export provisions may not be applicable for EOU-to-EOU transactions.
I kindly request your official clarification on the following point:
Does a supply of goods by a registered EOU to another registered EOU qualify as a "deemed export" under Notification No. 48/2017-Central Tax, and whether refund of gst can be claimed?