banner_ad

About sc court decision applicable now

202 views 1 replies
I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHETHER THE JUDGMENT GIVEN BY SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF "TARPAULIN INTERNATIONAL V/S COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHENNAI IN 2010 (256) E.L.T 481 (SC) HOLDS GOOD NOW ALSO AFTER INTRODUCTION OF HSN IN CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF? AS PER THIS DECISION MAKING OF TARPAULIN MADE FROM TARPAULIN FABRIC (WATER PROOF COTTON FABRIC- COMMONLY KNOWN) IS NOT A MANUFACTURING PROCESS AND HENCE IT IS TO BE TREATED AS COTTON FABRIC UNDER CHAPTER 52. EVEN BEFORE 2005 THERE WAS SPECIFIC ENTRY FOR TARPAULIN UNDER CHAPTER 63. SO PLEASE COMMENT ON THE SAME .
Replies (1)

Though the Tarpaulin has been classified under chapter heading 6306 under the Central Excise tariff Act, 1985, yet twin test of manufacture & marketability is to be satisfied for demanding excise duty, as held by the Supreme court in many cases. 

 

Raksh*t

 

09810525780


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
14 May 2026
Senior Associate

ABHISHEK SHANKAR AGARWAL & ASSOCIATES

Kolkata

CA

View Details
Company
22 May 2026
U.S. Financial Reporting & Consolidation Manager

Karia Overseas

Ahmedabad

CA

View Details
Company
14 May 2026
ICSI Trainees for 21 Months and Semi-Qualified CS

CMNITY HIRE

New Delhi

Others

View Details
Company
14 May 2026
Financial Analyst - Remote Finance Expert

HiringBridge

Ahmedabad

CA

View Details
Company
18 May 2026
MIS Executive

Primarc Pecan Retail Limited

Mumbai

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 14 May 2026
CA ARTICLE

PRAVEEN GARG & CO

Faridabad

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
19 May 2026
Article, CA & Paid Assistant Positions

Aggarwal Sarawagi and Co

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
22 May 2026
Sr. Financial Analyst - Consolidation

Search Synergy

Mumbai

CA

View Details