Income Tax Judgements

The ITAT, New Delhi in The ACIT, Circle-47(1), New Delhi v. Ashish Bansal [ITA No.7427/Del/2018 dated June 2, 2023]dismissed the Appeal of the Revenue Department and held that the Commissioner has correctly deleted the addition made by the Assessing

The ITAT, Ahmedabad in the case of M/s.Joshi Technologies International Inc. v. The Asst. Director of Income Tax [ITA Nos. 3456/Ahd/2010 & 3195/Ahd/2011, dated May 19, 2023] held that oil wells are plant and machinery, and accordingly, higher depreci

The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Tvl. Sri Maharaja Industries v. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) [W.P Nos. 16075, 16077, 16080 and 16082 of 2023 and W.M.P.Nos.15499, 15500, 15501, 15502, 15506, 15508, 15509 & 15511 of 2023, dated Ma

The ITAT, Ahmedabad in the matter of the DCIT, Central Circle-1(1), Ahmedabad v. NBM Iron & Steel Trading Pvt. Ltd. [ITA No. 205/Ahd/2022, dated May 17, 2023]held that if an assessee during a survey surrendered his income and later showed that income

The Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in Pramod Kumar Madhogarhia v. The Union of India & Ors. [MAT 729 of 2023 with I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2023 dated May 12, 2023] has set aside the Show Cause Notice ("SCN") issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act,

The ITAT, New Delhi in ACIT v. Surya Global Steel Tubes Ltd[ITA No. 4778/Del/2016 dated May 09, 2023] has held that no income tax additions can be made when source of investment made against the share capital/ premium/ warrants, stands explained, as

The jewellery seized of Rs.16,77,363/- is intra polated in the jewellery found of Rs.43,17 ,442/-. Hence, keeping in view the entire disclosed jewellery as per the WTR and as found in the premises, we hold that no addition can be made on this account

The Supreme Court has set aside the Rajasthan High Court's order of allowing the loss claimed by assessee on account of confiscation of silver bars by the Customs department, as 'business loss' under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ass

The Supreme Court has held that in a case of negligence committed by Doctor, the Insurance Company which covered the Doctor would have to reimburse the compensation to the complainant to the extent of its liability under the Insurance Policy as, agai

THE ITAT held that additions cannot be made only on the basis of declaration made under section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 without any corroborating evidence to prove the addition.