The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Goods and Services Tax and Central Excise v. SNQS International Socks Private Limited [Civil Appeal Diary No(s). 8343/2024 dated March 19, 2024] dismissed the Commissioner of Goods and Services
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others [Criminal Appeal No. 3589 of 2023 dated February 29, 2024], held that the Hon'ble Apex Court, in the exercise of its jurisdiction unde
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others [Criminal Appeal No. 3589 of 2023 dated February 29, 2024], held that the Hon'ble Apex Court, in the exercise of its jurisdiction unde
The CESTAT, Allahabad in the case of M/s. Mahesh & Co. Pte Ltd. Singapore v. Commissioner of Customs Noida[Customs Miscellaneous Application 2 of 2022 dated November 9, 2023], imposed a penalty of Rs.2,00,000/- for causing delay in implementation of
The Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in the case of Jayshree Bhardwah v. Deputy Commissioner of Revenue W.B. State Tax & Ors. [WPA 1504 of 2023 dated August 7, 2023] allowed the writ petition and held that the Petitioner's appeal was dismissed by the Reve
In exercise of powers, the Central Government directed investigation into the affairs of one Group of Companies and LLPs by Officers of Serious Fraud Investigation (SFIO) as nominated by Director, SFIO.
The Hon'ble Supreme court in the matter of State Tax Officer v. Shabu George (Ib) Special Leave Petition (SLP) No.27670/2023 dated July 31, 2023]dismissed the SLP filed by the Revenue Department against the order of the Hon'ble Kerela High Court orde
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Paschimachal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited v. Raman Ispat Private Limited [Civil Appeal No. 7976 of 2019 dated July 17, 2023] held that Section 238 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("IBC") overrides
The State Commission has correctly appraised the case, no jurisdictional error, or legal principle ignored, or miscarriage of justice, is visible. Its Order of 25.08.2014 calls for no interference.
The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in Yusuf khan M Pathan & Irfan Khan Pathan v. C.C.E. & S.T. [Final Order No. A/ 10086-10087 /2023 dated January 20, 2023] Set aside the order demanding Service Tax on the fees paid to cricketers. Held that, the fees received by
Live Course on Invoice Management System (IMS) - 2nd Batch(With Recording)