Learning from life
106 Points
Joined January 2011
1.Firstly I am thankful for your words of appreciation, Sir your observation and research is correct but in this case your employee is giving you the service not a vendor who is engaged in renting a cab service.Secondly to avoid compliance of 50% on part of employee it is advised to take 100% RCM on abated value( being this scenario is followed in practical sitution on many of our clients).
2.Even if SP under RCM does not charge ST on his part then also there is no implication on SR for that part.In such a case contact the Vendor and instruct on charging ST on his part.
3.In case of GTA if SP is individual/huf/Properietorship concern liable to pay freight then RCM is applicable. you can read the exact wording below
As per Entry No. A(ii) of N/
No.-30/2012, reverse charge is applicable only when taxable service provided or agreed to be provided by a goods transport agency in respect of transportation of goods by road, where the person liable to pay freight is,—
a) any factory registered under or governed by the Factories Act, 1948 (63 of 1948);
b) any society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 (21 of 1860) or under any other law for the time being in force in any part of India;
c) any co-operative society established by or under any law;
d) any dealer of excisable goods, who is registered under the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944) or the rules made there under;
e) any body corporate established, by or under any law; or
f) any partnership firm whether registered or not under any law including association of persons;
So, it can be clearly seen that an individual/proprietorship firm is not covered in the above ‘specified category’. It means, if the freight is paid (either himself or through his agent) by an individual/proprietorship firm or HUF then the service tax thereon shall be paid by the GTA itself.