Complained to vinod Jain (Non-adherance of Regulation 60)


(Guest)

Hey friends, i have mailed to Vinod Jain (member of the Central council of ICAI & also former chairman of Board Studies) regarding non-adherance of Regulation 60 (working hours of Article Trainees) of CA Regulations, 1988 by Practicing Chartered Accountants. Please read below regarding my correspondance through mail with him

 

 

"RE: RE: Non-Adherance of Regulation 60 of CA Regulations, 1988

 

Your e mail is not clear as no evidence or base is given please

 

 Regards

CA VINOD JAIN

504 Chiranjiv Tower

43 Nehru Place

New Delhi 110019

India

Off:+91 11 26223712, 26226933, 26228410

Res:+91 11 23288101, 23265320

Mobile:+919811040004

vinodjainca @ gmail.com

vinodjain @ inmacs.com 

 

From:  [mailto:myearnings @ gmx.com

Sent: 25 April 2011 09:15

To: Vinod Jain

Subject: Fw: RE: Non-Adherance of Regulation 60 of CA Regulations, 1988

 

----- Original Message -----

From: myearnings @ gmx.com

Sent: 04/21/11 06:27 PM

To: Vinod Jain

 Subject: RE: Non-Adherance of Regulation 60 of CA Regulations, 1988

 Dear Sir,



Please find the attached file which contains details of a few firms which are contravening Regulation 60 of CA Regulations, 1988. I request you to conduct investigation in this regard in respect of the firms mentioned in the attached file and take necessary action. Also please give a reply to me.



Regards,

CA Final Student

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Vinod Jain

Sent: 04/21/11 12:55 PM

 To: myearnings @ gmx.com 

 Subject: RE: Non-Adherance of Regulation 60 of CA Regulations, 1988

 

Pl give us specific cases to enable us to take up

 

 Regards

CA VINOD JAIN

504 Chiranjiv Tower

43 Nehru Place

New Delhi 110019

India

Off:+91 11 26223712, 26226933, 26228410

Res:+91 11 23288101, 23265320

Mobile:+919811040004

vinodjainca @ gmail.com

vinodjain @ inmacs.com

  

From: [mailto:myearnings @ gmx.com]

Sent: 21 April 2011 12:17

To: vinodjainca @ gmail.com

Subject: Non-Adherance of Regulation 60 of CA Regulations, 1988

 

 Dear Sir,



I am CA Final Student. I have a serious grievance regarding Articleship. 

  According to Regulation 60 of the CA Regulations, 1988-

"The working hours for the articled assistants should not exceed 35 hours in a week excluding the lunch break and normally an articled assistant be required to work during the normal working hours fixed for articled assistants. In case of the exigencies of work with the Principal, an articled assistant may be required to work beyond his/her normal working hours. However, under such circumstances, the aggregate number of working hours shall not exceed 45 hours per week. The requirement to work beyond 35 hours in a week should not be a practice but only in exceptional circumstances. Further, where the articled assistant is required to work beyond normal working hours, and aggregate of such hours exceed 35 hours per week, he/she shall be entitled to compensatory leave calculated with reference to number of completed working hours, over and above, 35 hours per week."



But unfortunately atleast 9 out of 10 CA Firms are contravening this Regulation. Generally, the minimum working hours in a CA firm for an Article Trainee are around 45 hours in a week (excluding lunch break). And in the audit season i.e., from May to September, the working hours goes well beyond 50 hours.



I agree that Articleship is a very important part of Chartered Accountancy. But at the same time, we should spend time for the preparation of our exams as well. Because, it is only when a student clears the exams he/she will become a Chartered Accountant no matter whatever the amount of Practical Knowledge he/she may have.



Hence I request you to take an immediate action in this regard.



Thanks & regards, 

CA Final student"

 

 

 

Now Friends please tell what evidence i can provide to him. I find it strange that he is not aware of the working hours of Article Trainees in CA Firms.

 

I request the students and experts to give their views in this regard.