The Hon’ble Supreme Court in M/s. New Noble Educational Society,v. The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax 1 [Civil appeal no. 3795 of 2014 dated October 19, 2022] has held that for tax exemption, the charitable institution, society or trust should ‘sol
Since the CIT(A) has erred in holding that the assessee has not filed the return u/s 139(1) of the I.T. Act and denied the benefit u/s 115BAA of the I.T. Act, we reverse the decision of the CIT(A) on this point. Therefore, hold that the assessee is e
The Hon'ble Supreme Court, India in the matter of Union of India v. Ganpati Dealcom (P.) Ltd [Civil Appeal No. 5783 of 2022 dated August 23, 2022] has held that the revenue department cannot initiate criminal proceedings for transactions entered into
The Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax - 1, Kolkata v. M/s. Beekay Steel Industries Limited,[No.- ITAT/177/2021 IA No.GA/1/2021 and IA NO.GA/2/2021] has held that when the assessee adjusted excise duty payable on clos
The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in M/s. NITCO LIMITED v C.C.E. & S.T.-DAMAN [Excise Appeal No.13016 of 2019] has held that the Clearing and Forwarding ("C&F") agent service is an admissible input service in the terms of Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 20
The Hon'ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh in the matter of M/s Dhara Enterprises v. Appellate Authority & Joint Commissioner [Writ Petition No.27676 of 2019 dated May 12, 2022] has upheld the order passed by the Revenue Department imposing the tax lia
It was held that from a plain reading of the Explanation 2 to Section 37(1), expenditure incurred towards CSR activities shall not be allowed as 'business expenditure' and shall be deemed to have not been incurred for business. The embargo created by
The CESTAT, Hyderabad in the matter of M/s. VITP Private Limited v Commissioner of Central Tax, Hyderabad [Final Order No: A/30070-30073/2022 dated July 8, 2022] set aside the demand of service tax on refundable security deposit on the grounds that s
The amount spent on cost of improvements to make the property habitable allowable as deduction and indexation while computing the capital gains however the amount spent on personal effects such as refrigerator, air conditioner LED, TVS furniture, din
Section 271(1)(c) cast responsibility upon the AO to reach the clear finding with respect to levy of penalty under the specific charge and if the AO fails to do so then the penalty cannot be levied as such penalty order shall not be maintainable in t
CAclubindia
