Avail 50% discount on all subjects for Nov batch(access till Nov 20th). Use coupon code Nov14.

×
Home > judiciary > Income Tax > Rule 19(2) apply in the absence of prosecution


Please Wait ..

Sign-in to your account


Username:
Password:

Remember Me

Forgot your password?

Sign-up now



Join CAclubindia.com and Share your Knowledge. Registered members get a chance to interact at Forum, Ask Query, Comment etc.


Rule 19(2) apply in the absence of prosecution

Court : INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL


Brief : : Having regard to Rule 19(2) of ITAT Rules, 1963 and following various decisions of the Tribunal including in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India (P) Ltd., reported in 38 ITD 320 (Del.) and the judgment of Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Estate of late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, 223 I.T.R. 480 (MP), we treat the appeal of the assessee as un-admitted and dismiss the same


Citation : M/s IFC Overseas, B-11, 2nd Floor, Gujaranwala Town, New Delhi-110009. (PAN/GIR No.AAAFI7160H)(Appellant) Vs. ACIT, Circle 20(1), New Delhi. (Respondent)


Judgment :


 

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

(DELHI BENCH `C’: NEW DELHI)

 

BEFORE SHRI U.B.S. BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND

SHRI J.S. REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

 

ITA No.1028/Del./2012

(Assessment Year: 2008-09)

 

M/s IFC Overseas,

B-11, 2nd Floor, Gujaranwala Town,

New Delhi-110009.

(PAN/GIR No.AAAFI7160H)

(Appellant)

 

Vs.

 

ACIT, Circle 20(1),

New Delhi.

 (Respondent)

 

Assessee by: None

Revenue by: Shri Aroop Singh, Sr.DR

 

ORDER

PER U.B.S. BEDI, J.M.

 

This appeal of the assessee emanates from the order of the CIT (A)-XXII, New Delhi, dated 9.12.2011, relevant to assessment year 2008-09.

 

2. Despite getting the case adjourned by the Counsel of the assessee on 16.10.2012, nobody attended nor any request for adjournment has been received. So, it is inferred that the assessee is not interested in prosecution of the present appeal.

 

3. Having regard to Rule 19(2) of ITAT Rules, 1963 and following various decisions of the Tribunal including in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India (P) Ltd., reported in 38 ITD 320 (Del.) and the judgment of Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Estate of late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, 223 I.T.R. 480 (MP), we treat the appeal of the assessee as un-admitted and dismiss the same

.

4. As a result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed for want of prosecution.

 

Order pronounced in open court soon after the conclusion of the hearing on 16.10.2012.

 

Sd/- Sd/-

(J.S. REDDY) (U.B.S. BEDI)

ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER

 

 

Dated: Oct. 16, 2012

SKB

 

Copy of the order forwarded to:-

 

1. Appellant

2. Respondent

3. CIT

4. CIT (A)-XXII, New Delhi.

5. CIT (ITAT) Deputy Registrar, ITAT





Posted by : [Scorecard : 6355] Posted on 24 January 2013


Tags :- rule 19 2apply absence prosecution
Read / Write Comments







Submit



Quick Links







Browse By Category


 


Subscribe to Feeds

Subscribe to Judiciary Feed


Enter your email to receive Judiciary Updates:








back to the top