Court :
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
Brief :
On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) ought not have deleted the addition of Rs. 4,49,95,728 representing expenses for acquisition of rights
The learned CIT(A) ought to have appreciate the fact that the provisions of sec. 32 amended by F.A. No. 2) Act, 1988 w.e.f. 1.4.1999 where the expenditure incurred on acquisition of ownership in intangible assets like, know-how, patents, copy rights, trademarks, licences etc., which are acquired on after 1.4.1998 are deemed to be in the nature of capital expenditure on which depreciation is allowable.
Citation :
DCIT Appellant Vs. M/s. Aditya Music (I) Respondent
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
R P S K & Associates
Nashik
CA Inter
View Details
Shyam Joshi & Associates
Pune
B.Com
View Details
CAclubindia
