Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

Held that - Any payment by a closely held company by way of advance or loan to a concern in which a substantial shareholder is a member holding a substantial interest is deemed to be "dividend" on the presumption that the loans or advances would ulti

The Hon'ble Madras High Court in M. Mallika Mahal v. The Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise [WP.Nos.10663 of 2022 dated August 17, 2022] held that the assessee should be permitted to file GST returns for the period before the cancellation

The CESTAT, Delhi in M/s Miraj Products Pvt. Ltd. V. Commissioner, Central Goods & Service Tax [Final Order Nos. 50804 – 50805/2022 dated September 02, 2022] held that the assessing authority has not found any undeclared machines in the manufacturing

The Hon'ble Central Information Commission in Anil Khanna Vs CPIO [CIC/DGSTCX/A/2021/129351 dated September 19, 2022] directed the Center Public Information Officers ("CPIO") to provide an extract of a copy of relevant rules or notifications pertaini

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of M/s Shree Enterprise Coal Sales Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Anr [Civil Appeal No 6539 of 2022 dated September 12, 2022] overruled the Allahabad High Court judgment and ordered to remand the proceedings back

The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Munjal Showa Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise [Civil Appeal Nos. 2576 of 2010 AND 5608 of 2011 dated September 23, 2022] dismissed both the appeals filed by the assessee and directed the adjudic

The provisions of Section 236 of the Companies Act, 2013 specifically provides the procedure of acquisition of shares of minority, when a person personally or acting in concert with acquirer, acquires 90% or more issued share capital of the company b

Whether the decision of the Board of Directors to write off the bad debt and operation of bank Account warrants judicial interference in respect of Oppression and Mismanagement of Companies?

Since the CIT(A) has erred in holding that the assessee has not filed the return u/s 139(1) of the I.T. Act and denied the benefit u/s 115BAA of the I.T. Act, we reverse the decision of the CIT(A) on this point. Therefore, hold that the assessee is e

For insurance claim under MVA,1988 in case of driver of a borrowed motor vehicle personal insurance is necessary. A person driving a motor vehicle of his /her friend enters into shoes of the owner of the vehicle and his/her heirs or legal representat