banner_ad

Assessee is allowed to withdraw before any decision made


Last updated: 09 November 2012

Court :
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Brief :
At the time of hearing, ld A.R. submitted that assessee be allowed to withdraw his appeal. Learned D.R submitted that he has no objection to accept the prayer of ld A.R. In view of submissions of ld representatives of parties, we accept assessee’s prayer to withdraw the appeal.

Citation :
Amit Pandya, 165, Parekh Nagar, S.V. Road, Kandivali(W), Mumbai-67 PA No.AFVPP 0474 K (Appellant) Vs. ACIT 25(3), Pratyakshakar Bhavan, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E), Mumbai(Respondent)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,

MUMBAI BENCH ‘A’ BENCH

BEFORE SHRI B.R.MITTAL(JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND

SHRI B.RAMAKOTAIAH (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER)

ITA No.5213/Mum/2009

Assessment Year: 2005-06

Amit Pandya,

165, Parekh Nagar, S.V. Road,

Kandivali(W),

Mumbai-67

PA No.AFVPP 0474 K

(Appellant)

Vs.

ACIT 25(3),

Pratyakshakar Bhavan, Bandra Kurla

Complex, Bandra (E), Mumbai

(Respondent)

Appellant by: Shri Pradeep Sagar

Respondent by: Shri T.D.Singh

Date of hearing: 23.8.2012

Date of pronouncement: 5 .9.2012

ORDER

Per B.R.Mittal, JM:

The assessee has filed this appeal for assessment year 2005-06 against order dated 8.5.2009 of ld CIT(A)-XXV, Mumbai on following grounds:

“1. The ld CIT(A) erred in confirming assessment of income earned by the appellant from sale of shares held as investment and returned under the head “short term gain” as profits and gains of business.

2. The ld CIT(A) erred in directing the assessing authority to proportionally apportion establishment expenses on bonus shares as per the provisions of the Act.”

2. At the time of hearing, ld A.R. submitted that assessee be allowed to withdraw his appeal. Learned D.R submitted that he has no objection to accept the prayer of ld A.R. In view of submissions of ld representatives of parties, we accept assessee’s prayer to withdraw the appeal.

3. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Pronounced in the open court on 5th September, 2012

                                                      Sd/-                         Sd/-

                                      (B.RAMAKOTAIAH) (B.R. MITTAL)

                                         Accountant Member    Judicial Member

Mumbai, Dated 5th September, 2012

Parida

Copy to:

1. The appellant

2. The respondent

3. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals),XXV, Mumbai

4. Commissioner of Income Tax, City-25, Mumbai

5. Departmental Representative, Bench ‘A’ Mumbai

//TRUE COPY//

BY ORDER

ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI

 

CCI Pro

CS Bijoy
Published in Income Tax
Views : 1261

Comments




CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news


Company
29 May 2026
Accounts assistant

Shubh Consultancy

Mumbai

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
Featured 26 May 2026
Account Executive

SMJ global advisors pvt ltd

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 28 May 2026
SEMI QUALIFIED/ CA DROPOUTS/ ARTICLES

T R SOOD & CO

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
14 May 2026
Senior Associate

ABHISHEK SHANKAR AGARWAL & ASSOCIATES

Kolkata

CA

View Details
Company
21 May 2026
Associate

PWC

Kolkata

CA

View Details
Company
26 May 2026
CA / MBA (Finance) / CMA / M.Com (Finance)

Sri Aurobindo Gnostic Centre of Education

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
26 May 2026
Audit executive

vdsr & co LLP

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 14 May 2026
CA ARTICLE

PRAVEEN GARG & CO

Faridabad

CA Foundation

View Details