close Change the way you learn with CCI Online Coaching   view more

Please Wait ..

Sign-in to your account


Username:
Password:

Remember Me

Forgot your password?

Sign-up now



Join CAclubindia.com and Share your Knowledge. Registered members get a chance to interact at Forum, Ask Query, Comment etc.


Discussion > Income Tax > Tax queries >

Income from other sources

    Post New Topic
Pages : 1





CA FINAL GRP 1 CLEARED

[ Scorecard : 68]
Posted On 08 November 2011 at 08:48 Report Abuse

What is the difference between Section 56(2)(vi) and the newly inserted Section 56(2)(vii), since both states that

in case of Individual and HUF, any money recieved without consideration of an amount exceeding Rs. 50000/-

during a financial year from any person or persons will be treated as income.



CA Sripal Jain
Associate consultant at infosys

[ Scorecard : 680]
Posted On 08 November 2011 at 10:35

section 56(2)(vi) speaks about the gifts from unrelated persons,whereas Section 56(2)(vii) speaks about gifts as well as property gifted for adequate consideration(its a newly inserted provision from finance act 2010,therefore property is difference between both the clauses

regards

sripal jain




CA PARAS BAFNA
CA

[ Scorecard : 22682]
Posted On 08 November 2011 at 22:36

 

56(2)(vi) (before 1.10.2009) = 56(2)(vii) (a) (on or after 1.10.2009).

So the first difference is  the date of applicability. 

56(2)(vii) (b) and 56(2)(vii)(c) with its proviso give more teeth to the Act.

If you read carefully ----- you will find many interesting facts which will force you to confuse.

Keep in mind the different treatments while reading this  dangerous section ------as regards ...

1. Property

2. Movable and immovable Property.

3. Adequate, inadequate and NIL consideration.

4. Aggregate Values and Individual Values of Gifts.

5. Aggeregation of Aggregate values whether will be done or not. 

 

 

 



Ankan Mohanty
CA FINAL GRP 1 CLEARED

[ Scorecard : 68]
Posted On 09 November 2011 at 12:17

I want to know the difference in the cash gift part only.
What is the difference other than the date of applicability?

What was the intention of dept in including the cash gift part again in section 56(2)(vii),
when it was already there in sec 56(2)(vi).
 

 



CA Sripal Jain
Associate consultant at infosys

[ Scorecard : 680]
Posted On 09 November 2011 at 13:36

dude u dint get my answr i guess property is included in new section,from 1.10.09 for adequate consideration if u receiva an immovable property u wil be taxed 



Ankan Mohanty
CA FINAL GRP 1 CLEARED

[ Scorecard : 68]
Posted On 09 November 2011 at 13:43

@ shripal jain :my q was regarding cash gift only. i know both movable n immoble property was included but y bring out d cash gift again in sec 56(2)(vii) whr it was also dere in sec 56(2)(vi)



CA PARAS BAFNA
CA

[ Scorecard : 22682]
Posted On 09 November 2011 at 16:17

@ Mohanty, You are right. 56(2)(vi) itself could be numbered as 56(2)(vi) (a) and the other sub-clauses

could be thereunder.  You may say that an unnecessary exercise was done by the draftsman to this extent.

.

Neverthless, assessee has been benefited by these 2 clauses (vi) and (vii) as they are separated from each other.  In each clause the assessee can claim cash gifts exempt from non relatives upto 50000/ in each of the periods. 

.

 

 



Total thanks : 1 times

There are 6 Replies to this message






Related Files








Related Threads


Post your reply for Income from other sources



Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to login


Not a member yet ?? Click here to signup

Message







    

  • Use thank button to convey your appreciation.
  • Maintain professionalism while posting and replying to topics.
  • Try to add value with your each post.