In question no 3(b), we have to answer as per sec 2(5), where as question was about 2(f)..................it has wasted my 10 minutes. Do u also had same problem????????????
In question no 3(b), we have to answer as per sec 2(5), where as question was about 2(f)..................it has wasted my 10 minutes. Do u also had same problem????????????
Vinay Ramachandran
(Chartered Accountant)
(168 Points)
Replied 18 May 2010
i noticed the error too......but i knew the question was on Manufacture and remembered the case law .........the facts were same as the facts of the case mentioned in the paper........so no problem........in fact while writing the answer i mentioned that manufacture is defined under section 2(f) of CENTRAL EXCISE ACT 1944........
Parth - CA,CS,CMA
(Learner)
(406 Points)
Replied 19 May 2010
Yes buddy.. Even i thought of putting up a note there.. But then thought not to mess up with ICAI.. :): )
And how could it waste ur 10 minutes!! If u r conceptually all right..
CA-CWA RAVI
(CA-CWA in industry)
(5464 Points)
Replied 19 May 2010
galti bhagwan se bhi hoti hain dosto
so while attempting paper iam sure if i find any mistake i will correct it in my answers
whenever i read module i find many mistakes
well ICAI should be responsible enough not to commit such mistakes
but if it does
wat can we do ?? except suffering ?
Lalit aggarwal
(.)
(371 Points)
Replied 22 May 2010
i hav just read the que. nd got it................so no wastage of time.......
Rohit
(Founder & CEO)
(45 Points)
Replied 22 May 2010
come on yaar, we know it was 2(f) instead of 2(5), but anyways its was a professional examination and that too at final level, so accourding to me the institute should accept that it was a falt on their part, if the institute inself shows a NO CARE ATTITUTE what will the students do.
"Live class on Python for Financial Analysis: Unlocking Efficiency in Accounting and Finance"