Ankur Mittal
CA FINAL 1GRP CLEARED
[ Scorecard : 718]
|
Posted On 26 March 2012 at 17:44
|
With Due respect to others opinion , i dont think there is any change required in ICAI curriculam..introduction of GMCS is an excellent step by ICAI.
Only change required is in CA students due to large number of student opting for CA they themselve are scared...we are far far far ahead of MBA's in Knowledge,
which company wud prefer an MBA ahead of CA when its comes to finance , TAX. MBA's are selected as an cheap alternative only.( i know how much MBA's are paid only when they are from IIM or FMS only...))
We need to change our atttude and be confident..
I know i am a lot better than MBA even if i haven't cleared Final( till now :P)...be confident..attitude changes everything my friend.
|
|
|
MANI.
NO
[ Scorecard : 285]
|
Posted On 26 March 2012 at 23:01
|
ther is a change in syllabus every day
better to go with it
|
|
|
|
DHIRAJ
Article assistant
[ Scorecard : 21]
|
Posted On 11 June 2012 at 12:06
|
yes. there is a need for change in ca course structure. there should be four levels of exams. 1st :CPT, 2nd: like pcc/ipcc but only 4 subject (which will be help ful in articleship training) 2.5 years article trainiung, afer training 3rd exam only with those subject which will be helpful for doing industrial training in corporates (including some mba subjects) then 1 year compulsory industril training in corporates then immidiately 4th exam CA Final . with four levels students burden will be less , because subjects are divided. in third exam with mba subjects students wil get interest in subjects & study. and here also they get practical knowledge in management before industrial training . in whole ca ctructure there should be a subject of economics.
|
|
|
Chandrani
CA Final Student
[ Scorecard : 159]
|
Posted On 29 December 2012 at 22:16
|
Industrial training should be made compulsory during the last year of articleship. And orientation programmes can be made compulsory once in every year during articleship. Because the current programmes are so short in duration that make hardly any difference.
|
|
|
Apudi
Student
[ Scorecard : 112]
|
Posted On 14 January 2013 at 00:57
|
articleship period should be reduced to 1 year
or else i should be after ca finals only
odrwise its a sheer time waste
wastin ur life jus to realise ur not a CA
n articleship in firms should be alloted on merit basis as is the case for allotin colleges in AIEEE
no reference thing coz it plays a major role in makin one a GOOD CA
|
|
|
Chandrani
CA Final Student
[ Scorecard : 159]
|
Posted On 16 January 2013 at 21:20
|
I agree with Apudi on the matter that articleship period should be reduced to 18 months or 2 years. Because during that period, preparing for the exams with the tuitions is very very tough. And it is one of the causes that students prefer dummy articleship than having practical experience.
And I have seen a number of qualified CAs who don't have practical knowledge though they have completed their articleships.
|
|
|