Ca final may 14 ama query

852 views 2 replies

This is regarding the LP question asked (Refer Q. No. 3(b)) of the question paper, refer attachment). Suppose we calculate the hours required to produce 30 units of product X(3) (which comes to 180 hrs. and 120 hrs. for machining and assembly respectively), and reduce the minimum available hours for the remaining two products for each deptt. In such a case, we are able to formulate an LPP in two variables only (for products X(1) and X(2)). The solution becomes simpler, as otherwise, a third constraint i.e. x(3) = 30 will have to be added. Will such an approach be considered correct in the exam?

/editor_upload/961026175untitled.png

 

Replies (2)
Its perfect,not to worry,it was a six mark question

yup! in fact i did the same in the exams!

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
24 June 2026
Chartered Accountant - GST & Direct Tax

APL

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 20 June 2026
Articleship

RB KESHRI & CO

Mumbai

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 24 June 2026
HEAD - AUDIT AND TAXATION

A R JADHAV AND ASSOCIATES

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 27 June 2026
CA Articled Trainee And Paid Assistant

SKAA & Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
Taxation Content Writer Intern

Interactive Media Pvt Ltd.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
25 June 2026
Accounts & Taxation Executive

Dindukurthy & Associates

Hyderabad

MBA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
2 posts Article assistant and Articleship completed students

Chirag N Shah & Associates

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
Article Assistant or Paid Assistant

VIKAS VERMA & CO

New Delhi

Others

View Details