Ca final may 14 ama query

This is regarding the LP question asked (Refer Q. No. 3(b)) of the question paper, refer attachment). Suppose we calculate the hours required to produce 30 units of product X(3) (which comes to 180 hrs. and 120 hrs. for machining and assembly respectively), and reduce the minimum available hours for the remaining two products for each deptt. In such a case, we are able to formulate an LPP in two variables only (for products X(1) and X(2)). The solution becomes simpler, as otherwise, a third constraint i.e. x(3) = 30 will have to be added. Will such an approach be considered correct in the exam?

/editor_upload/961026175untitled.png

 

Replies (2)
Its perfect,not to worry,it was a six mark question

yup! in fact i did the same in the exams!

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
19 September 2026
CA/Semi-CA/BCom

Pravin Sarvaiya

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 21 September 2026
Consultant - Reporting

Finrep Advisors LLP

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 01 October 2026
Articled Assistant

KPSN & Associates LLP

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
16 September 2026
Internal Audit - Team Lead

Consulting & Beyond

Chennai

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 16 September 2026
CA Article Trainee

SR BAGAI & Co.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 September 2026
Article/ Paid Assistant

Murali and Sumeet Chartered Accountant

Bengaluru

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
04 September 2026
CA inter Or ca finalist

A Jaiswal and company

Lucknow

CA Final

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 04 September 2026
Accounts Executive

Hema Yashwanth & Associates

Chennai

B.Com

View Details