Court :
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Brief :
Assessee is in appeal before us. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee argued that applying Rule 8D for the year under consideration is against the ratio laid down by the Jurisdictional High Court of Bombay in the case of Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. Vs DCIT 328 ITR 81.
We find that this issue is covered by the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of JCIT Vs Rolta India Ltd. 330 ITR 470 wherein it has been held that in case of company which are liable to tax u/s. 115JB / minimum alternative tax , have to pay interest u/s. 234B/234C of the Act. We therefore direct the AO to levy interest as per provisions of the Act after giving effect to the decision of ground No. 1.
Citation :
M/s. Govind Properties Pvt. Ltd.,Seksaria Chambers, 4th Floor, Nagindas Master Road, Fort, Mumbai-400 001 PAN-AAACG 1408P (Appellant) Vs. The ACIT-2(1), Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai-400 020 (Respondent)
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
Shaswat initial support private limited
Ahmedabad
CS
View Details
T R SOOD & CO
New Delhi
CA Inter
View Details
SSGS and Associates
Chennai
CA Inter
View Details
CAclubindia
