Court :
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Brief :
The brief facts of the above issue are that it was found by the Assessing Officer that the assessee has allowed M/s. Hutchison Max Telecom Ltd. to erect the tower on their terrace in consideration of an amount of ` 5,93,700 and claimed as income from house property subject to deduction under section 24 of the Act. However, the Assessing Officer while observing that the assessee’s society has not provided any house property to the company and it is only the open terrace which has been let out, treated the same as assessable under the head income from other sources without allowing any expenditure in this regard. On appeal, the learned CIT(A) while confirming the Assessing Officer’s action treating the income from other sources directed the Assessing Officer to allow 20% of the gross receipts as expenses to earn such income
Citation :
M/s Mahalaxmi Sheela Premises CHS Ltd., 2, Bhulabhai Desai Rd, Mahalaxmi, Mumbai-26 PAN NO.AAABM0285F Appellant Vs. ITO WD 16(2)(1), Matru Mandir, Mumbai-400 034. Respondent
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
R P S K & Associates
Nashik
CA Inter
View Details
Rahul Dang & Associates-Chartered Accountants
Pune
CA Inter
View Details
O P Bagla & Co LLP
New Delhi
CA Inter
View Details
SSGS and Associates
Chennai
CA Inter
View Details
CMNITY HIRE
New Delhi
Others
View Details
CAclubindia
