|
Court : INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Brief : : None appeared on behalf of the assessee when the appeal was called for hearing nor any request for adjournment was filed. Even before the Assessing Officer[AO in short], none appeared while last notice dated 9.12.2010 issued u/s 143(2) & 142(1) of the Act by the AO was refused by the secretary of the society and as a result, assessment was completed in the manner provided u/s 144 of the Act. In these circumstances, it , therefore, appears that the assessee is not interested in pursuing this appeal. Accordingly, following the decision of the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Multiplan (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs CIT [38 ITD 320] (Del) and the decision of the Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar Vs CWT [(1996) 223 ITR 480 (MP)], this appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed, in limine.
Citation : M/s Aditya Siksha & Swasthya Samiti(Regd.)C/o Shri Suramveer Singh s/o shri Hari Singh, V&PO Ghasola, Tehsil Charkhi Dadri, District Bhiwani(Haryana) [PAN: AABTA6163B] (Appellant) Vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward -1,HUDA Commercial Complex,Bhiwani-127021. (Respondent)
Judgment :
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL: ‘A’ BENCH, NEW DELHI
(BEFORE S/SHRI SHRI U.B.S.BEDI ,JM & A.N.PAHUJA, AM )
ITA no. 1667/Del/2012
Asstt. Year:- 2008-09
M/s Aditya Siksha & Swasthya
Samiti(Regd.)C/o Shri Suramveer
Singh s/o shri Hari Singh, V&PO
Ghasola, Tehsil Charkhi Dadri,
District Bhiwani(Haryana)
[PAN: AABTA6163B]
(Appellant)
Vs
Income-Tax Officer,
Ward -1,HUDA Commercial
Complex,Bhiwani-127021.
(Respondent)
Assessee by: None
Revenue by: Shri A.K.Singh, DR
Date of Hearing: 12-06-2012
Date of Pronouncement: 12-06-2012
O R D E R
A.N. PAHUJA:
This appeal filed on 10.4.2012 by the assessee against an orders dated 28-11-2011 of the ld. CIT(A)-Rohtak for the Assessment Year 2008- 09 ,raises various grounds relating to denial of exemption for an amount of `95,046/- & `17,02,452/- u/s 10(23C)(iiiad)of the Income-tax Act,1961[hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’] besides addition of `13,13,806/- u/s 68 of the Act and disallowance of `1,87,000/- u/s 40a(ia) of the Act..
2. None appeared on behalf of the assessee when the appeal was called for hearing nor any request for adjournment was filed. Even before the Assessing Officer[AO in short], none appeared while last notice dated 9.12.2010 issued u/s 143(2) & 142(1) of the Act by the AO was refused by the secretary of the society and as a result, assessment was completed in the manner provided u/s 144 of the Act. In these circumstances, it , therefore, appears that the assessee is not interested in pursuing this appeal. Accordingly, following the decision of the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Multiplan (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs CIT [38 ITD 320] (Del) and the decision of the Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar Vs CWT [(1996) 223 ITR 480 (MP)], this appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed, in limine.
Sd/- Sd/-
(U.B.S.Bedi) (A.N. Pahuja)
Judicial Member Accountant Member
New Delhi
Copy of the order forwarded to:
The Assessee/ITO Ward 1-,Bhiwani/ The CIT concerned/ CIT(A)- Rohtak/DR/ Guard file
By order
Deputy Regist rar of ITAT, New Delhi Bench
|
