banner_ad

If difference in the sale and purchase is properly explained than AO cannot make any addition by their own


Last updated: 24 February 2012

Court :
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Brief :
The assessee is engaged in the business of trading in chemicals. The sales shown in the Profit & Loss Accounts were Rs. 3,15,85,478/- and against that purchases were shown as Rs. ,93,31,117/- on which gross profit of Rs. 7.95% was declared. The assessee was required to submit month-wise details of sales and purchases according to which the total sales were reported at Rs. 3,22,81,924/- and purchases were reported at Rs. 3,04,17,709/-. Thus, it was observed by the Assessing Officer that there was a difference of Rs. 6,96,447/- in the sales and Rs. 10, 86,596/- in the purchases. The assessee was required to explain the same and the assessee tried to explain the difference by reducing the GP @ 8% and on these calculation the Assessing Officer observed that the shortage of stock available for sale with the assessee in the month of May, 2005 was to the extent of Rs. 71,835/- and, therefore, the Assessing Officer observed that the assessee had made sales out of the books. Similarly, in the month of November, 2005 the Assessing Officer noticed that sales were made to the tune of Rs. 28,39,639/- against the available stock of Rs. 20,27,795/- which also resulted in the shortage of stock of Rs. 5,84,672/-. He further found that during the month of December, 2005 to March, 2006, according to the purchases and sales made by the assessee, the stock available with the assessee was Rs. 18,67,797/- against which the closing stock was disclosed only at Rs. 9,38,250/-. The Assessing Officer made addition of the difference between these two which has been computed at Rs. 9,29,547/- being the difference in stock as at the end of the year. The Assessing Officer asked the assessee to explain the same and the assessee submitted the reconciliation and the sales included the sale return as well as the purchase return. The Assessing Officer did not believe the explanation of the assessee on the ground that prior to that this explanation was not furnished by the assessee and he has added the said amount to the income of the assessee. Similarly, on the excess sales which was found to be made by the assessee in the month of May and November, 2005, the Assessing Officer has computed 8% gross profit on these sales of Rs. 6,96,447/- and further addition of Rs. 55,715/- has been made.

Citation :
ACIT,Circle, Noida G Block,Shopping Complex,Sector 20, Noida.(Appellant) Vs.Surjeet Kaur,Prop. Ajmani Chemicals,E-82, Sector 27, Noida.PAN: AKUPK2464L (Respondent)

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
Buy CCI PRO Now

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

CCI Pro

Ayush
Published in Income Tax
Views : 1406

Comments




CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news


Company
21 May 2026
Associate

PWC

Kolkata

CA

View Details
Company
23 May 2026
Account Executive

SMJ global advisors pvt ltd

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
14 May 2026
Financial Analyst - Remote Finance Expert

HiringBridge

Ahmedabad

CA

View Details
Company
01 June 2026
Audit, Taxation & Compliance Executive

R P S K & Associates

Nashik

CA Inter

View Details
Company
26 May 2026
Education Content Creator

Adyayam Education LLP

Bengaluru

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 09 June 2026
Article Trainee

Numbertree LLP

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
16 May 2026
Audit clerk

mgirt & co

Bengaluru

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 28 May 2026
Accounts, Audit & Compliance Executive

Shyam Joshi & Associates

Pune

B.Com

View Details