The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Anant Narain v. Union of India [W.P. (C) 7280 of 2020 and CM Appls. 24543-44 of 2020, dated January 06, 2021] set aside disqualification of the directors of the defaulting Company and provided an opportunity to the dis
In Sri Nanjundaiah v. Union of India Directorate of Enforcement, Karnataka, The State of Karnataka Bengaluru [C.P. No. 45 of 2021 connected with C.P. No. 43 of 2021 dated July 28, 2021], Sri Nanjundaiah ('the Petitioner'), the founder of Kanva Souhar
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Chennai,dated 27.09.2016 and pertains to assessment year 2008-09.
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-17, Chennai,dated 29.01.2019 and pertains to assessment year 2014-15.
The Revenue has filed the present appeal against the order dated 30.11.2018 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Shimla [for short ’the CIT(A)’] for the assessment year 2013-14, whereby the Ld. CIT(A) has allowed the appeal filed by the as
This is an appeal by the Legal heir of the deceased assessee against the order dt. 26/04/2019 of Ld. CIT(A)-1, Chandigarh.
The appellant Trust has filed the present appeal against the order dated 12.3.2020 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh [for short ’the CIT(E)’], vide which the Ld. CIT(E) has denied registration to the applicant Trust u/s 12
ITA No.896/Bang/2008 a0 n appeal by the Revenue while ITA No.790/Bang/2008 is an appeal by the assessee. Both these appeals are directed against the order of the CIT(A), LTU, Bengaluru, relating to Assessment Year 2002-03.
The facts and circumstances under which this appeal by the revenue is listed for hearing before the Tribunal is as follows:
Present appeal has been filed by assessee against the final assessment order dated 31/01/2017 passed by Ld. DCIT circle 6 (1) (1), Bangalore for assessment year 2012-13 on following grounds of appeal:
CAclubindia
