|Home > judiciary|
Please Wait ..
Displaying Judiciary 1 - 10 of 1497 in 150 pages
Guest On 05 December 2013 at 11:03
A brief analysis of the study depicts that though the assessee was proceeded ex-parte, the learned CIT(A) has not decided the matter on merits.
Disallowing the deduction claimed as amount paid towards gratuity fund for which approval from the concerned CIT is pendingBy Guest On 27 November 2013 at 11:39
The assessee is in appeal against the order dated 16.09.2009 passed by the ld. CIT(A) in the matter of an assessment made by the AO u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, (-the Act-) for the A.Y. 2004-05.
Niyati On 22 November 2013 at 11:33
This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-VII, New Delhi dated 24.6.2011 pertaining to assessment year 2008-09.
Aruhi On 21 November 2013 at 10:14
This is assessees appeal against CIT(A)s order dated 2-07- 2012 relating to A.Y. 2008-09. Various grounds are raised, which in effect raise following issues: (i) disallowance of expenditure; and (ii) disallowance of business expenditure.
Application for maintenance (U/S 24-HMA) has to be decided first before an order for filing WS is passed against the applicantBy Guest On 24 October 2013 at 17:29
It is very unfortunate litigation between the husband/petitioner and wife/respondent who are Advocates of the Supreme Court and of this Court. They got married on 25th January, 1996. However, in the year 2004, the husband, who is the petitioner herei...
CS Bijoy On 30 September 2013 at 13:52
On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ld.CIT(A) has erred in annulling the re-assessment proceedings u/s 147 on the basis of change of opinion by the AO on the issue of -allowability of Sponsorship Expenses- even when the AO did not ...
Order passed on non submission of document for reason beyond of control can be restored on submissionBy CS Bijoy On 28 September 2013 at 11:06
We have heard both the parties and carefully gone through the orders of the authorities below. On perusal of assessment order, we find that the assessment has been completed under sec. 143(3) of the Act. Notices under sec. 143(2) and/or under sec. 14...
Guest On 27 September 2013 at 11:27
Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee company is a financial company under the Interest Tax Act, 1974, liable to tax there under and if yes, then which portion of the income/receipts of the assessee company can be co...
Guest On 23 August 2013 at 12:08
It was fairly conceded by the Ld.AR of the assessee that the issue involved is covered against the assessee by the decision of the special bench of the Tribunal rendered in the case of ACIT vs. Hindustan Mint & Agro Products Pvt. Ltd., as reported in...
Guest On 22 August 2013 at 13:23
In all these three appeals by the assessee, the only ground raised is about the chargeability of Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) on channel placement charges. The amount of channel placement charges paid by the assessee in the years under appeal is as under...
Updated on : 06/12/2013 17:10:11