Court :
High Court, Madras
Brief :
The Hon’ble High Court of Madras after observing that there was no audit initiated/ conducted against the Petitioner or in business premises of the Petitioner, held that:
- Audit of service recipient, SIPL is not relevant and the Petitioner was never put to notice before March 1, 2013;
- Even otherwise, the letter dated March 7, 2013 was an intimation and was neither initiation of audit nor communication of audit objection;
- Even assuming that it was an intimation of audit objection, yet communication on March 7, 2013 was much after cut-off date.
Citation :
Ovieya Builders Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax (Appeals), Coimbatore [(2015) 53 taxmann.com 26 (Madras)]
Browse CAclubindia ads free.
Latest updates on WA.
Daily E-Newsletter and much more.
CCI PRO annual subscription :
Duration : 1 year
(Prices Inclusive of GST)
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English