Court :
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Brief :
We find that the AO has not given any reason for disallowing the claim. We also find that the AO has simply followed the findings of earlier assessment years. As similar additions in earlier assessment year has been deleted by Ld. CIT(A) which has been accepted by the Revenue as Committee on Dispute declined to give permission to the department to proceed with the appeal , findings of the Ld. CIT(A) become final. As Ld. CIT(A) has rightly pointed out that after the amendment in Section 36(1)(vii), the assessee is not required to demonstrate that the debt is bad . We do not find any infirmity in the finding of Ld. CIT(A). We also draw support from the order of Tribunal in ITA No. 500/M/06 for assessment year 2002-03 in the case of very same assessee in which the Tribunal has allowed the claim of bad debt. Respectfully following the decision of the Tribunal, the claim is allowed for this year also.
Citation :
The ACIT-2(1), Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) Vs. M/s. Bobcards Ltd., 2nd Floor, Baroda House, Behind Dewan Shopping Centre, S.V. Road, Jogeshwari (W), Mumbai-400 102 PAN-AAACB1989L (Respondent)
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
Sri Aurobindo Gnostic Centre of Education
New Delhi
CA
View Details
T R SOOD & CO
New Delhi
CA Inter
View Details
Rahul Dang & Associates-Chartered Accountants
Pune
CA Inter
View Details
SSGS and Associates
Chennai
CA Inter
View Details
CAclubindia
