GST Judgements

The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 2 vide his Report dated 24.04.2019, furnished to this Authority under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, had submitted that he had conducted an investig

The appellate authority for advance ruling uphold the ruling passed under section 98(4) of the CGST Act 2017 vide NO.KAR ADRG 81/2019 dated 30-09-2019 i.e. Contention of the appellant is dismissed on all accounts.

1. The applicant sought Applicability of GST on Land owners share of constructed residential flats, since Joint development agreement entered between Land owner and Builder entered before the commencement of construction of the building and Construct

A combined reading of the provisions of section 2A (2) of the MV Act and Entry No. 242A of Schedule I of the Rate Notification establishes that the battery pack is an essential character of an e-rickshaw. An electrically operated three-wheeled vehicl

Section 3(26) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 defines “immovable property” as to include land, benefits to arise out of the land, and things attached to the earth, or permanently fastened to anything attached to the earth. Applicability of the Gener

This judgement is quite loudable judgement in favour of the taxpayers having inverted duty structure. In regard to the applicability, since there is no contrary judgment in this issue till date, so, this judgement has pan India applicability.

When a statement recorded under Section 70 under GST CGST Act, 2017 is Relevant and Admissible? -Analysis of Section 136 of CGST Act, 2017

As per the Gujarat AAR Decision in case of Shree Sawai Manoharlal Rathi it has been ruled that Interest on PPF and SB and on Personal Loans and Advanced to family/friends would be considered while calculating the "Aggregate Turnover".

From the conjoint reading of the provisions of Act and Rules, it appears that by prescribing the formula in Sub-rule 5 of Rule 89 of the CGST Rules,2017 to exclude refund of tax paid on "input service" as part of the refund of the unutilized input ta

High Court decided to grant the bail to the petitioner who is allegedly guilty of creating bogus firms/companies solely for the purpose of fraudulently creating and issuing GST invoices without any sale/purchase and actual movement of goods.