Subscribe CCI Newsletter
Assessee is a Partnership firm involved in the business of banking and registered under the Kerala Money Lending Act.Notice u/s 148 of the Act was issued to the respondent-assessees. The firm had accepted payments from the partners, during the releva
The Petitioner, Vodafone India Services Pvt. Ltd., is a wholly owned subsidiary of a non-resident company, Vodafone Tele-Services (India) Holdings Limited (the holding company). In AY 2009-10,the Petitioner issued equity shares on a premium to its ho
The assessee, a Chartered Accountant, was subjected to search u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for providing accommodation entries in form of share loss or share gain by issuing bills for shares without actual sale and purchase by the party menti
Zaheer Mauritius - Petitioner Versus - Director of Income Tax - Respondent
In AY 1985-86, the Assessee had paid interest on deposits and claimed deduction under section 80V of the I.T. Act 1961 as the said deposits were primarily obtained for the payment of taxes under the I.T. Act. The Assessing Officer rejected the claim
Appellantis a NBFC in thebusiness of investments in shares and securities, money lending and finance. 10 companies merged with the assessee company w.e.f. 1.4.2007. The assessee filed its original return declaring loss of Rs.1,90,84,382/- on 30.9.200
The assessee company is a non-banking finance company engaged in the business of consultancy, investments, finance and trading in shares.During the course of a survey conducted by investigation wing of the department on Shri Subodh Gupta, CA in 2003,
The Assessee Company is engaged in the business of manufacturing basic chemicals and chemical intermediates and is a Government of India enterprise.The present Appeal is a case of disallowance of payment of employees' contribution to the P.F. amounti
The assessee company is a tax resident of United Kingdom incorporated under the laws of England. The assessee is engaged in the business of providing “foreign exchange deal matching system” which enables foreign exchange authorized dealers to effect
n this appeal, the order passed by the ITAT confirming that of the Commissioner of Income Tax was questioned. The assessee had bought 3 flats, one in his own name, another in the name of his wife and his own and the third in the name of his wife. The
