Supreme Court Judgments

 Audit | Income Tax | Custom | VAT | Service Tax | Companies Act | CA Students | I Technology | Others| Excise

 

T. N. K. Govindaraju Chetty. vs CIT(SC)

T. N. K. Govindaraju Chetty. vs CIT(SC)
Supreme Court Decision dt.17-04-1967

 66 ITR 465(SC)

JUDGMENT

The judgment of the court was delivered by

SHAH J.---The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal submitted two questions for the opinion of the High Court of Madras :

" (1) Whether the sum of Rs. 1,28,716 is assessable as income under any of the provisions of the Act ?

(2) If the answer is in the affirmative, the assessment years in which the amount falls to be assessed by suitable apportionment? "

The first question was answered by the High Court in the affirmative. The High Court declined to answer the second question because it did not, in their view, arise out of the order of the Tribunal. The assessees have appealed to this court.

By order dated January 30, 1944, the Collector of Madras, exercising power under rule 75A of the Defence of India Rules, 1939, requisitioned a property known as " Lutterals Gardens " belonging to the assessees. The property continued to remain under requisition till it vested in the Government of Madras absolutely in consequence of an order made on May 24, 1949, by the Collector of Madras, under section 5 of the Requisitioned Land (Continuance of Powers) Act, 1947, declaring the intention of the Government of Madras to acquire that property. The assessees declined the offer made by the Collector to pay Rs. 2,40,000 as compensation for acquisition of the property and interest at the rate of 6 per cent. thereon from the date of the notification for acquisition, and the dispute relating to the compensation payable to the assessees was referred to the Chief Judge of the Court of Small Causes, Madras. By order of the High Court of Madras in appeal from the order of the Chief Judge it was adjudged that the assessees be paid Rs. 5,00,000 as compensation for the property. The High Court also award