Wrote on 12 January 2013
Yes, i agree with Anushree.
It is a transparent system...
|
Wrote on 17 December 2012
no..it would involve more forgery and frauds
Wrote on 17 December 2012
Wrote on 17 December 2012
Wrote on 16 December 2012
yes, it can bec govt is doing well but
also step will be taken that govt officer should also be honest in this procees for transfering amt direct into account
Wrote on 15 December 2012
Wrote on 15 December 2012
Right way:)
Wrote on 15 December 2012
cash transfer is not a good idea.how can this type of schemes to take poor people became rich.Indian govt first focus on corrupted representatives and amendments in election commission.
Wrote on 15 December 2012
Wrote on 15 December 2012
Wrote on 15 December 2012
NO :( what is the guarantee that the subsidies substitute in cash will be used only for subsidies? this loop hole has to be looked into. certain conditions can be imposed so as to ensure that this scheme is successful:)
Wrote on 15 December 2012
Direct cash transfer scheme is unfavourable as many villages India do not have banks. And many of the people living in rural areas do not even know how to transact with bank.
Wrote on 15 December 2012
Wrote on 15 December 2012
beacuse cash transfer is the better way of the convert black money in white money and after giving subsidies the donner encash it.
Wrote on 15 December 2012
Wrote on 15 December 2012
Wrote on 15 December 2012
Wrote on 15 December 2012
Wrote on 14 December 2012
if its starts be ready for another scam
Wrote on 14 December 2012
bcoz indian people noet educatated and they not interested in banking real econamey in village. in our india run two type econamey run 1st shown in books 2nd not shown in books. if govt. lanuch vds scheme indian econamey become largest econamey in world. but poltical wish not complete this. other wise our contry very good econamey its avidence many compenies comes in india they search own future in india . india largest consumer product market in world.
Wrote on 14 December 2012
yes
Wrote on 14 December 2012
bcoz indian people noet educatated and they not interested in banking real econamey in village. in our india run two type econamey run 1st shown in books 2nd not shown in books. if govt. lanuch vds scheme indian econamey become largest econamey in world. but polt
Wrote on 14 December 2012
Wrote on 14 December 2012
it is the best way to form black money
Wrote on 14 December 2012
Wrote on 13 December 2012
change the poll question admin
Wrote on 13 December 2012
Wrote on 13 December 2012
Wrote on 13 December 2012
it will not reach the benificiary this idea has a lot of loop holes....
Wrote on 13 December 2012
Wrote on 13 December 2012
yes cash transfer will helf poors and avoid corruption.
Wrote on 13 December 2012
no one knows the cash will reached to people
Wrote on 13 December 2012
Wrote on 13 December 2012
Wrote on 13 December 2012
Wrote on 13 December 2012
Wrote on 12 December 2012
yes it will stop the corruption....
Wrote on 12 December 2012
subsidy should transfer to the beneficiary through bank account.as a result it will reach in the hand very safely.
Wrote on 12 December 2012
Wrote on 12 December 2012
Wrote on 12 December 2012
Wrote on 11 December 2012
Wrote on 11 December 2012
because the flow of money in the society has been increased ,the subsidy amount which will be released by the govt doesn't meet the requirements of poor people.low quality of basic necessities will be flow into the market.in this situation there is a chance of increased inflation.
Wrote on 11 December 2012
Wrote on 11 December 2012
Wrote on 11 December 2012
Wrote on 11 December 2012
no
Wrote on 11 December 2012
no.. cause it doesn't have proper tracing.
Wrote on 11 December 2012
Wrote on 11 December 2012
BTW, whose money is it? I'm wondering why should I pay Taxes to the Govt anymore?
Wrote on 10 December 2012
the most important problem is that these cash subsidies might not even reach to those in need of it...
Wrote on 10 December 2012
dws
Wrote on 10 December 2012
bcz it support corrptn....
Wrote on 10 December 2012
It will lead to further corruption
Wrote on 10 December 2012
Wrote on 10 December 2012
Goverment should provide employment instead of giving cash
Wrote on 10 December 2012
Wrote on 09 December 2012
unsatisfied people cannot meet each other. To avoid forming group of poor people may be Govt Starategy.
Wrote on 09 December 2012
it is election stunt, for theft by political parties
Wrote on 08 December 2012
SUBSIDY IS FOR NEED AND IT IS USE CENTRIC.....U WILL SEE THAT POOR PEOPLE WILL BUY MOBILES,T.V,AND OTHER USELESS STUFF FROM SUBSIDIARY...
Wrote on 08 December 2012
no
Wrote on 08 December 2012
susidies provided encourage the small business concerns and agriculture to sustain in their indivuality in their fields to avoid migration of people or to depend on other sectors. These to be reduced gradually depending on their success in their sectors.
In my view Presently it is vote bank promotion only and monopolise in local level markets and unemployment would spread more
Wrote on 08 December 2012
I think in kind transfer is a better way of transferring subsidies
Wrote on 08 December 2012
it is a better way if they are transfering in a nominal period say in a week or 15 days...but if they are taking a longer period then its not good...bcoz its public money which the govt is keeping with it and earning interest on tht amt...
Wrote on 07 December 2012
inrespect of iliterates they may not use money for buying goods. they may use for antoher purpose like personal use which may not be good
Wrote on 07 December 2012
no
Wrote on 07 December 2012
no
Wrote on 07 December 2012
Wrote on 07 December 2012
because this is just govt plan to back the subsidy in future.
just govt want people will purchase good at market rate then in future govt will stop the subsidy properly.
Wrote on 07 December 2012
no, it will not be success
Wrote on 07 December 2012
because this is just govt plan to back the subsidy in future.
just govt want people will purchase good at market rate then in future govt will stop the subsidy properly.
Wrote on 07 December 2012
oviously not. electronic transfer would be the best. however for small scale transactions oviously cash transfer is the only solution till now
Wrote on 07 December 2012
Becuz Cash Transfer is better way to pay any type libilty other than terms
Wrote on 07 December 2012
.
Wrote on 07 December 2012
Wrote on 07 December 2012
no
Wrote on 07 December 2012
Wrote on 06 December 2012
A better way of corruption and extortion..
Wrote on 06 December 2012
Although its a good way to transfer subsidies. But it will not work in india. It will increase corruption....
Wrote on 06 December 2012
here is many way to transferring than why cash ???????? we can use electronic way for fund transferring.
Wrote on 06 December 2012
Cheating would be more
Wrote on 06 December 2012
If it happens then we spoil the people to work hard
Wrote on 06 December 2012
Any subsidies will have some cut money for the politicians.
Wrote on 06 December 2012
Wrote on 06 December 2012
Wrote on 05 December 2012
because by cash transfer tax evasion may arises, lack of transparency arises,faulty receipts & not recording it in books of account & lot many deficiencies may arise.
Wrote on 05 December 2012
Wrote on 05 December 2012
No it is ot a better way.....
It will encourage corouption.
Wrote on 05 December 2012
Chances of frauds will be increased if cash transfer of transferring subsidies is permitted.....
Wrote on 05 December 2012
how can the govt implement such a scheme..if the majority of people dont have aadhar cards and bank accounts in rural areas
Wrote on 05 December 2012
No..
Wrote on 05 December 2012
No, because cash transfer not valid mode of transfer and also no traceability of person can be identified after transfer of cash to recipient.
Wrote on 05 December 2012
the families having genuine need of subsidy have no money and kyc documents to open bank account besides if they have bank a/c they will have to spend on travelling 50% for getting cash subsidy
.jpg "CA SUMIT LAL")
Wrote on 05 December 2012
Subsidies should be available to public at large. We can not say earning 32 Rs. a day or not will decide about subsidies. Transferring cash when prices are way high will do no good for poorer even.
Wrote on 04 December 2012
Chance for Misappropriation
Wrote on 04 December 2012
yes....as it will directly get transfered into the accounts of concerned person
Wrote on 04 December 2012
yes it will be successful if implemented properly.
Wrote on 04 December 2012
It will not be right way because of our system of searching and identification of needed people for transferring of cash subsidy very corrupted and may be increased so first we required good system implementation for those who people actually required.
Wrote on 04 December 2012
Wrote on 04 December 2012
Wrote on 03 December 2012
No its not proper way
Wrote on 03 December 2012
no
Wrote on 03 December 2012
in such a corrupt atmosphere it is a bad idea.. it will only do good for officers and politicians.
Wrote on 03 December 2012
atleast something new is being tried out......we all know old system didn't work out.....may be this will help
Wrote on 03 December 2012
direct transfer through bank will reduce the corruption
Wrote on 03 December 2012
I find it a crap.This is some sort of plot by the Indian national Congress..to fill their vote banks
Wrote on 03 December 2012
Wrote on 03 December 2012
Wrote on 03 December 2012
Wrote on 03 December 2012
Well, it'll have its drawbacks.For Example - Could be used for purposes other than it has been given.
Wrote on 03 December 2012
Wrote on 03 December 2012
It looks like a tempting choclate cake... filled with expired caramel !!
Wrote on 03 December 2012
Direct cash transfer will make the monies more vulnerable as it could be misutilised in every possible manner. moreover, keeping a tight check over the actual disbursement of money shall also not be possible.
as id still doesn't spells out any scheme for rolling back of money if in case the conditions stipulated is not complied with , which is most likely to happen !!
Happy politics !! happy india !!
Wrote on 02 December 2012
Wrote on 02 December 2012
If cash transfer there is a lot of chance of fraud & not utilized the fund in correct purpose i.e misappropriation of cash.Therefore indeed subsidies transfer is better way.
Wrote on 01 December 2012
no
Wrote on 01 December 2012
through this possibility of black marketing will be reduced
Wrote on 01 December 2012
Wrote on 01 December 2012
....
Wrote on 30 November 2012
Wrote on 30 November 2012
Wrote on 30 November 2012
strategies to make subsidies available are not full proofed or supported by clean and good control...
Wrote on 30 November 2012
Wrote on 30 November 2012
effieciency in last mile delivery of subsidy is the key change required and not a change to direct cash transfers. This would then require an effective monitoring mechanism which is again another layer of the already existing red tapism
Wrote on 30 November 2012
most of villagrers don't have even a single bank account....is it possible for them to receive cash subsidy??
Wrote on 30 November 2012
height of misuse:
1 farmer(satisfied): thanks to the aadhar scheme all the subsidies due to me will be paid into bank A/c to prevent leakages
2nd farmer(surprised): i didnt know you had a bank account
1st farmer: i didnt,until my netaji opened a bank account for me in his name
Wrote on 30 November 2012
i also dont agree with the scheme since its not foolproof.
Wrote on 30 November 2012
It Ultimately Depends Upon the People.......How they Use it....????...As this Cash transfer Can easily be misused by People....!!!!!!
Wrote on 30 November 2012
Giving Subsidy in the form of cash is not advisable
Wrote on 30 November 2012
Wrote on 30 November 2012
Wrote on 30 November 2012
Wrote on 30 November 2012
Direct Cash Transfer is an appreciable scheme. The only correction required is that the amount should be transferred to the bank account of he home maker.
Wrote on 29 November 2012
Wrote on 29 November 2012
Wrote on 29 November 2012
Wrote on 29 November 2012
n
Wrote on 29 November 2012
but subject to correption
and where there is no bank at remote villages how it will be possible and also to whom has no bank account
Wrote on 29 November 2012
but subject to correption
and where there is no bank at remote villages how it will be possible and also to whom has no bank account
Wrote on 29 November 2012
Another way of corruption to make money by corrupt officers or politicians before cash transferring to beneficiary accounts.
Wrote on 29 November 2012
Wrote on 29 November 2012
only safer way is through bank.
Wrote on 29 November 2012
Wrote on 29 November 2012
Yes, if implemented properly.
Wrote on 29 November 2012
People becomes more lazy.
Wrote on 29 November 2012
Wrote on 29 November 2012
yess
Wrote on 29 November 2012
becz it ensure at least something reached to eligible persons than previous manner.
Wrote on 29 November 2012
Wrote on 29 November 2012
Wrote on 29 November 2012
Wrote on 29 November 2012
Wrote on 29 November 2012
In My View,This will not Reach the targeted persons,it will be like passing a Ice block through several hands before reaching the targeted Person.
Wrote on 28 November 2012
can't say
Wrote on 28 November 2012
ss
Wrote on 28 November 2012
THERE WILL BE NO CONTROL ON CORRUPTION.
Wrote on 28 November 2012
as per me..its really a good way to help BPL ppl as dey can have direct access with the GOI
Wrote on 28 November 2012
Wrote on 28 November 2012
corruption ka naya rasta khulega
Wrote on 28 November 2012
cash transfer is not a good move by government.It will only help govt only to raise votes in favour of them.
Wrote on 28 November 2012
Since this will lead to receipt of whole amount & will avoid leakage of money by the middlemen
Wrote on 28 November 2012
Yes I agree !
Wrote on 28 November 2012
Totally wastage..
Wrote on 27 November 2012
Wrote on 27 November 2012
Cash transfer subsidy may push the companies or entities to do fraud, they make take some steps to get the benifit of cash eventhough they are not required to.Cash susidy will not ensure that 100% of cash is used for particular purpose.
Wrote on 27 November 2012
Cash transfer subsidy may push the companies or entities to do fraud, they make take some steps to get the benifit of cash eventhough they are not required to.Cash susidy will not ensure that 100% of cash is used for particular purpose.
Wrote on 27 November 2012
Wrote on 27 November 2012
No, subsidies are given to control the prices of specific goods (like necessities petrol, gas etc) but if it is given in cash, it could be used by person for buying other commodities (other than necessities) so it wont serve the purpoes for which it was intended. and prices will increase and there are chances of misusing the cash as it is highly liquid
Wrote on 27 November 2012
Can't sau
Wrote on 27 November 2012
Wrote on 27 November 2012
Wrote on 27 November 2012
Because poor people haven't that much money to purchase material on actual price.
Wrote on 27 November 2012
possibility of fraud exists in cash transfers
Wrote on 27 November 2012
its donot safe
Wrote on 27 November 2012
Idea is good..but In practical wat ever the cash have been transferred it may not helpful for that purpose..
Wrote on 27 November 2012
Chances of Fraud are more in cash
Wrote on 26 November 2012
corruption will increase
Wrote on 26 November 2012
when Whole Govt. is corrupt, who wud assist subsidy cash transfer, unless authorities too are corrupt enough
Wrote on 26 November 2012
Wrote on 26 November 2012
No..........
Wrote on 26 November 2012
No..........
Wrote on 26 November 2012
Wrote on 26 November 2012
http://www.onlinejobsfree.com/?id=1150852
click on the above and register
earn money and help me too to earn
it's 100% free
and genuine .... u can check and see urself
Wrote on 26 November 2012
http://www.onlinejobsfree.com/?id=1150852
click on the above and register
earn money and help me too to earn
it's 100% free
and genuine .... u can check and see urself
Wrote on 26 November 2012
no
Wrote on 26 November 2012
Wrote on 26 November 2012
not only the cash transfer is better of transferring subsidies
Wrote on 26 November 2012
Wrote on 26 November 2012
No
Wrote on 26 November 2012
Wrote on 26 November 2012
I dont trust this government any more.., not even bank/internet transfer is trustable..
Wrote on 25 November 2012
because there's no cash accounting but there's a accounting to transfer cash ..........................
Wrote on 25 November 2012
Wrote on 25 November 2012
yes.
Wrote on 25 November 2012
I Agree with this because due to this black money is not generated and the needy people get the benefit of this.....
Wrote on 24 November 2012
Wrote on 24 November 2012
Wrote on 24 November 2012
Wrote on 24 November 2012
leads to Black money
Wrote on 24 November 2012
SUBSIDY AMOUNT WILL NOT REACH TO PUBLIC AND MIDDLEMAN WILL EATAWAY
Wrote on 24 November 2012
