CAclubindia Judiciary : Recent Comments

Home > Judiciary > Recent Comments

Please Wait ..

Recent Comments

Displaying 1 - 10 of 45 in 5 pages

Comments on : Whether manufacturing of goods without brand name decline assessee to avail the benefit of S.S.I notification	More comments on this
nice
Posted by Suraj jain on 17/04/2013 12:59:42

Comments on : Issue of interest U/S 16B of ITAT Act	More comments on this
nice
Posted by Ganesh on 08/04/2013 11:42:52

Comments on : The assessee is entitled to depreciation on account of capitalization of engineering service fees paid to a foreign company	More comments on this
Thanks for the update
Posted by Ganesh on 01/04/2013 17:35:26

Comments on : SSI exemption Notifn.No. 175/86	More comments on this
Hi, this is CA Anish Abrol from Jammu, your SSI Exemption notification is really helpful but i am not able to find this case any where online ""Faridabad Tools Pvt Ltd v/s CCE (2002-TIOL-79-CESTAT-DEL-SB"". Can you please mail me this case law if possible. My email id is consultca.anish@gmail.com This will be helpful. Thanks
Posted by Anish Abrol on 27/12/2012 10:16:54

Comments on : Advance received from clients against the bookings of shops	More comments on this
Wellll
Posted by Rupesh Soni on 27/10/2012 16:27:57

Comments on : PF contribution paid before the due date of filling return under section 139(1) is admissible	More comments on this
its benifit to employer
Posted by K.M.VELMURUGAN on 28/09/2012 17:47:57

Comments on : UPS is an integral part of computer so depreciation should be charged accordingly	More comments on this
Weather printer is also eligible for deduction @60%
Posted by priyanshu kr. gupta on 28/09/2012 00:40:59

Comments on : As per Article 26(3) of Indo-US DTAA the AO cannot seek to invoke the provision of sec 40(a)	More comments on this
Reading this case and judgement it is very clear that by common sense, the AO should not have disallowed the deduction. But, the greater point is how can a tax payer live a stressfree life when such excesses are happpening. Also what reprimand the Govt has for erring AOs. For the democracy to function, there must be counter sue mechanism where Govt is liable for pain, suffering and financial loss caused by erring AO. Are there provisions for this. pl comment
Posted by Gkumar on 22/08/2012 05:15:35

Comments on : Penalty under section 271 must be based on concealment of the particulars of the income and furnishing inaccurate particulars	More comments on this
Good read! Gave clarity on 271(1)(c) penalty.
Posted by Amit S on 21/08/2012 12:31:34

Comments on : Sec 145A said for valuation of inventory method to be adopted is the method of regularly used by the assessee but as per AS 2 changes can be adopted if only statute permit	More comments on this
Dear Ayush, We have implemented SAP Business one at one of our client site they are doing trading business.before the implementation they were following FIFO method but now the valuation method is weighted average. Auditor based on this case is saying that he will not file the tax audit report unless we change the method to FIFO. Its a very big procedure to change the method in SAP full year transaction has to be reentered my question is. the difference between both the method in 60000+ My question is. 1. Is it enough to show this amount as income and file the tax audit report and disclose it in form 3CD 2. In Next financial year can we stick on to Average method
Posted by shihabuddin on 16/08/2012 12:24:48

Sign-in to your account

Sign-up now

Recent Comments

Quick Links

Browse By Category