Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

This appeal arises from a decision rendered by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ("NCDRC") on 19 September 2018. The NCDRC partly allowed the appeal filed by the insurer against a decision of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Co

This court is of the view that the impugned order passed by the Tribunal does not suffer from any legal infirmity warranting interference. The substantial question framed by this court while issuing notice is answered in the affirmative, that is, in

The Mumbai Tribunal has allowed relief to BCCI and directed CIT to grant registration under Section 12A citing that BCCI is still promoting the game of cricket.

From above decision it is clear that if a reinsurance broker deduction it’s commission and remit balance commission to the foreign re-insurers with the permission of Reserve Bank of India ad according to the terms and conditions of an agreement with

In that view of the matter, whatever meagre amount is permissible under the statute must reach the victim's family without any loss of time when the compensation is sought for before the Court. The statute has taken care of the sufferings and pains o

It is clear that confidential information submitted before Settlement Commission cannot be basis of addition in the assessment proceedings. The AO must have with him some incriminating materials in hand to substantiate addition made on the basis of i

The Supreme Court of India has passed the verdict on an appeal of Vodafone by which the Company had challenged the order of NCDRC (National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission) by which it had firmed the view of State Consumer Disputes Redressal C

Sale of a technical concept, that the assessee developed on his own, with respect to website malware monitoring, assessable as business income.

The Adjudicating Authority, the National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench (NCLT), on January 21, 2019 approved MSL's resolution plan, which among other things involved an upfront payment of Rs 477 crores. While approving the resolution plan, the

The CESTAT, Delhi in M/s Rajasthan Rajya VidhyutPrasaran Nigam Ltd. v. Commissioner of CGST, Customs [Service Tax Appeal No. 53020 of 2018 dated January 01, 2022] set aside the order passed by the Revenue Department confirming demand of service tax o