Member (Account Deleted)
[ Scorecard : 256]
|
Posted On 21 December 2009 at 17:02
|
Hi!
A company transferred the employee from Chennai to Bombay. The employee incurred expenses on shifting to Bombay which the company reimbursed.
Had the FBT not been abolished it would have been liable to FBT. I am confused whether this is a perquisite? and taxable in the hands of the employee?
Please clarify.Its urgent
|
|
D н ! я σ ĵ
F!N/\L
[ Scorecard : 7041]
|
Posted On 21 December 2009 at 17:06
|
General understanding does not allow this expenses to add in perquisite... let others too reply on same
|
|
|
|
g@ur@V
SENIOR ARTICLE ASSISTANT
[ Scorecard : 61]
|
Posted On 21 December 2009 at 17:07
|
| Originally posted by : Priyadarshini |
 |
Hi!
A company transferred the employee from Chennai to Bombay. The employee incurred expenses on shifting to Bombay which the company reimbursed.
Had the FBT not been abolished it would have been liable to FBT. I am confused whether this is a perquisite? and taxable in the hands of the employee?
Please clarify.Its urgent |
 |
the co. is liable to pay expenses so it is covered under perqusities because the co. is not giving regular facility, it is the one time expenses so it will be treated as perqusities
|
|
g@ur@V
SENIOR ARTICLE ASSISTANT
[ Scorecard : 61]
|
Posted On 21 December 2009 at 17:13
|
| Originally posted by : Priyadarshini |
 |
the co. is liable to pay expenses so it is covered under perqusities because the co. is not giving regular facility, it is the one time expenses so it will be treated as perqusities
|
 |
the co. is liable to pay expenses so it is covered under perqusities because the co. is not giving regular facility, it is the one time expenses so it will be treated as perqusities
|
|
g@ur@V
SENIOR ARTICLE ASSISTANT
[ Scorecard : 61]
|
Posted On 21 December 2009 at 17:14
|
m i right ???????
|
|
Member (Account Deleted)
[ Scorecard : 256]
|
Posted On 21 December 2009 at 17:19
|
But this expenditure is incurred bcos of transfer by the employer.it is in relation to employment only....So how can the employee be liable to pay tax?It is a REIMBURSEMENT only no?that too related to employment.
|
|
CA Jayesh Gokalgandhi
CA in Industry
[ Scorecard : 111]
|
Posted On 21 December 2009 at 17:30
|
See section 10(14).. the amount paid will be exempt..
Any allowance (by whatever name called) granted to meet the cost of travel on tour or on transfer (including any sum paid in connection with transfer, packing and transportation of personal effects on such transfer will be exempt under Section 10(14).
This exemption is dependent on the amount of expenditure incurred. Hence, if the person has received compensation of 40K and has spent 30k only then 30K will be exempt. Ofcourse if he has spent 41K then exemption will be restricted to 40K only.
Total thanks : 1 times
|
|
Lucifer
Counting down to redemption - 15 weeks
[ Scorecard : 1641]
|
Posted On 21 December 2009 at 20:26
|
jayesh is right, the amount is a part of exempted salary.
|
|
Member (Account Deleted)
[ Scorecard : 256]
|
Posted On 22 December 2009 at 11:55
|
thanks jayesh..Reading Rule 2BB with 10(14) it is exempt..
|
|
manish
Article Assitant
[ Scorecard : 338]
|
Posted On 22 December 2009 at 12:35
|
yes it is exempt U/S 10(14).
|
|